Houston Casualty Company v. Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company et al

Filing 44

ORDER GRANTING the parties' stipulation to extend the responsive pleading deadline from 7/12/2016 to 8/26/2016 for receipt of plaintiff's responsive pleading to defendant Travelers Property Casualty Company of America's counterclaim, document 28 . Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 7/12/2016. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRESNO DIVISION 11 12 HOUSTON CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 CASE NO. 1:16-CV-00535-LJO-EPG v. THE CHARTER OAK FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY; ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY; PREFERRED CONTRACTORS INSURANCE COMPANY, RRG, LLC; THE PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY; WEST AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY; CRUM & FORSTER SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY; FINANCIAL PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY; MP NEXLEVEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.; and DOES 1 THROUGH 10, ORDER GRANTING SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE BY ADDITIONAL 45 DAYS (ECF No. 43) Defendants. 23 24 Pursuant to the Second Stipulation to Extend Responsive Pleading Deadline by 25 Additional 45 Days (ECF No. 43), filed by Plaintiff Houston Casualty Company (“HCC”) and 26 Defendant Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, erroneously sued as The Charter 27 Oak Fire Insurance Company and The Phoenix Insurance Company (“Travelers”), and good 28 cause having been shown, the Court HEREBY ORDERS as follows: 1 ORDER GRANTING 2ND STIPULATION TO EXTEND RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE 1 2 The deadline for HCC to file a responsive pleading to Travelers’ Counterclaim (ECF No. 28) is extended by 45 days, from July 12, 2016 to August 26, 2016. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: July 12, 2016 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 ORDER GRANTING 2ND STIPULATION TO EXTEND RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?