Houston Casualty Company v. Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company et al
Filing
44
ORDER GRANTING the parties' stipulation to extend the responsive pleading deadline from 7/12/2016 to 8/26/2016 for receipt of plaintiff's responsive pleading to defendant Travelers Property Casualty Company of America's counterclaim, document 28 . Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 7/12/2016. (Rooney, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
FRESNO DIVISION
11
12
HOUSTON CASUALTY COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
CASE NO. 1:16-CV-00535-LJO-EPG
v.
THE CHARTER OAK FIRE
INSURANCE COMPANY; ACE
AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY;
PREFERRED CONTRACTORS
INSURANCE COMPANY, RRG, LLC;
THE PHOENIX INSURANCE
COMPANY; WEST AMERICAN
INSURANCE COMPANY; CRUM &
FORSTER SPECIALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY; FINANCIAL PACIFIC
INSURANCE COMPANY; MP
NEXLEVEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.; and
DOES 1 THROUGH 10,
ORDER GRANTING SECOND
STIPULATION TO EXTEND
RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE BY
ADDITIONAL 45 DAYS
(ECF No. 43)
Defendants.
23
24
Pursuant to the Second Stipulation to Extend Responsive Pleading Deadline by
25
Additional 45 Days (ECF No. 43), filed by Plaintiff Houston Casualty Company (“HCC”) and
26
Defendant Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, erroneously sued as The Charter
27
Oak Fire Insurance Company and The Phoenix Insurance Company (“Travelers”), and good
28
cause having been shown, the Court HEREBY ORDERS as follows:
1
ORDER GRANTING 2ND STIPULATION TO EXTEND RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE
1
2
The deadline for HCC to file a responsive pleading to Travelers’ Counterclaim (ECF No.
28) is extended by 45 days, from July 12, 2016 to August 26, 2016.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated:
July 12, 2016
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
ORDER GRANTING 2ND STIPULATION TO EXTEND RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?