Houston Casualty Company v. Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company et al

Filing 65

ORDER APPROVING the stipulation to extend Houston Casualty Company's responsive pleading deadline with respect to Travelers' counterclaim. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/7/2016. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FRESNO DIVISION HOUSTON CASUALTY COMPANY, 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 CASE NO. 1:16-CV-00535-LJO-EPG Plaintiff, v. THE CHARTER OAK FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY; ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY; PREFERRED CONTRACTORS INSURANCE COMPANY, RRG, LLC; THE PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY; WEST AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY; CRUM & FORSTER SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY; FINANCIAL PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY; MP NEXLEVEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.; and DOES 1 THROUGH 10, 17 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND HOUSTON CASUALTY COMPANY’S RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE WITH RESPECT TO TRAVELERS’ COUNTERCLAIM Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Pursuant to the stipulation and agreement of Plaintiff, Houston Casualty Company, and Defendant, Travelers Property Casualty Company of America [Doc. 63], IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. Travelers shall file an amended Answer and Counterclaim, if appropriate, within 28 days following the approval of this Stipulation. 2. If Travelers files an amended Counterclaim, HCC shall answer or otherwise plead to Travelers’ Amended Counterclaim within 21 days after filing. 3. If Travelers does not file an amended Counterclaim, HCC shall answer or otherwise plead to Travelers’ original Counterclaim within 14 days after the expiration of 28 1 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE 1 Travelers’ 28-day period described in Paragraph 1, above. 2 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: September 7, 2016 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?