Houston Casualty Company v. Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company et al
Filing
65
ORDER APPROVING the stipulation to extend Houston Casualty Company's responsive pleading deadline with respect to Travelers' counterclaim. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/7/2016. (Rooney, M)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
FRESNO DIVISION
HOUSTON CASUALTY COMPANY,
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
CASE NO. 1:16-CV-00535-LJO-EPG
Plaintiff,
v.
THE CHARTER OAK FIRE
INSURANCE COMPANY; ACE
AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY;
PREFERRED CONTRACTORS
INSURANCE COMPANY, RRG, LLC;
THE PHOENIX INSURANCE
COMPANY; WEST AMERICAN
INSURANCE COMPANY; CRUM &
FORSTER SPECIALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY; FINANCIAL PACIFIC
INSURANCE COMPANY; MP
NEXLEVEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.; and
DOES 1 THROUGH 10,
17
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO
EXTEND HOUSTON CASUALTY
COMPANY’S RESPONSIVE PLEADING
DEADLINE WITH RESPECT TO
TRAVELERS’ COUNTERCLAIM
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Pursuant to the stipulation and agreement of Plaintiff, Houston Casualty Company, and
Defendant, Travelers Property Casualty Company of America [Doc. 63], IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED as follows:
1.
Travelers shall file an amended Answer and Counterclaim, if appropriate, within
28 days following the approval of this Stipulation.
2.
If Travelers files an amended Counterclaim, HCC shall answer or otherwise plead
to Travelers’ Amended Counterclaim within 21 days after filing.
3.
If Travelers does not file an amended Counterclaim, HCC shall answer or
otherwise plead to Travelers’ original Counterclaim within 14 days after the expiration of
28
1
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE
1
Travelers’ 28-day period described in Paragraph 1, above.
2
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated:
September 7, 2016
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?