Williams v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al

Filing 30

Order GRANTING stipulated Protective Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/13/2016. (Rosales, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION 8 WINSTON W. WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:16-cv-00537-LJO-EPG 9 Plaintiff, 10 vs. 11 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, 12 LLC; EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; WELLS FARGO BANK, 13 N.A.; and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive, Action Filed: Trial Date: 14 April 14, 2016 None Set Defendants. 15 The Court has reviewed the stipulated protective order filed on September 9, 2016 (Doc. 16 29). The Court adopts the protective order with the exception that the judicial intervention 17 procedures outlined at ¶ 6.2 shall be subject to the informal discovery dispute process outlined in 18 this Court’s scheduling order issued on August 9, 2016. (Doc. 26, Section V, pgs. 4-5). 19 Specifically, the parties must participate in an informal telephonic conference with the Court and 20 obtain permission prior to filing any motion. Additionally, any document that the parties seek to 21 file under seal shall be filed in compliance with LR 141 rather that Civil Local Rule 79-5, as 22 currently cited in the document. See, ¶ 12.3. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: September 13, 2016 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 07685.1642/8515487.1 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 07685.1642/8515487.1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?