Williams v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al
Filing
30
Order GRANTING stipulated Protective Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/13/2016. (Rosales, O)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION
8
WINSTON W. WILLIAMS,
Case No. 1:16-cv-00537-LJO-EPG
9
Plaintiff,
10
vs.
11
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES,
12 LLC; EXPERIAN INFORMATION
SOLUTIONS, INC.; WELLS FARGO BANK,
13 N.A.; and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive,
Action Filed:
Trial Date:
14
April 14, 2016
None Set
Defendants.
15
The Court has reviewed the stipulated protective order filed on September 9, 2016 (Doc.
16
29). The Court adopts the protective order with the exception that the judicial intervention
17
procedures outlined at ¶ 6.2 shall be subject to the informal discovery dispute process outlined in
18
this Court’s scheduling order issued on August 9, 2016. (Doc. 26, Section V, pgs. 4-5).
19
Specifically, the parties must participate in an informal telephonic conference with the Court and
20
obtain permission prior to filing any motion. Additionally, any document that the parties seek to
21
file under seal shall be filed in compliance with LR 141 rather that Civil Local Rule 79-5, as
22
currently cited in the document. See, ¶ 12.3.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
Dated:
September 13, 2016
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
28
07685.1642/8515487.1
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
07685.1642/8515487.1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?