Williams v. Hill et al

Filing 37

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ( 35 , 36 ), signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/21/2018: The Motion is DENIED. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

BRETT LEE WILLIAMS,

9
10
11

Plaintiff,

Case No. 1:16-cv-00540-LJO-EPG (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS

v.
(ECF. NOS. 35 & 36)
T. E. HILL, et al.,

12

Defendants.

13
14

Brett Williams (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights

15

action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

16

magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

The matter was referred to a United States

17

On May 17, 2018, Plaintiff filed a motion for a preliminary injunction (“the Motion”).

18

(ECF No. 35). On May 21, 2018, Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean entered findings and

19

recommendations, recommending that the Motion be denied. (ECF No. 36).

20

Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and

21

recommendations. The deadline for filing objections has passed, and Plaintiff has not filed

22

objections to the findings and recommendations.

23

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this

24

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

25

the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper

26

analysis.

27

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

28

1. The findings and recommendations issued by the magistrate judge on May 21, 2018,
1

1
2

are ADOPTED in full; and
2. The Motion is DENIED.

3
4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____

June 21, 2018

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2