Padron v. City of Parlier et al
Filing
22
ORDER Disregarding Plaintiff's Consent or Decline Form, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/14/2016. (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ALFONSO PADRON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
Case No. 1:16-cv-00549-SAB
ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
CONSENT OR DECLINE FORM
v.
(ECF No. 21)
14
CITY OF PARLIER, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff Alfonso Padron, proceeding pro se filed this civil rights complaint pursuant to 28
18 U.S.C. § 1983 on April 19, 2016. (ECF No. 1.) Along with his complaint, Plaintiff filed a form
19 consenting to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 2.) On November
20 22, 2016, Defendant Lara filed a form consenting to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge and
21 this action was reassigned to the undersigned. (ECF Nos. 18, 20.) On December 12, 2016,
22 Plaintiff filed a second consent or decline form in which he declined to consent to the jurisdiction
23 of a magistrate judge. (ECF No. 21.)
24
Once a civil case is referred to a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the reference
25 can be withdrawn only “for good cause shown on its own motion, or under extraordinary
26 circumstances shown by any party.” Dixon v. Ylst, 990 F.2d 478, 480 (9th Cir. 1993). Plaintiff
27 has previously consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. There is no absolute right to
28 withdraw consent to trial and other proceedings before the magistrate judge. Dixon, 990 F.2d at
1
1 480. The Court does not find good cause to have Plaintiff’s consent withdrawn. Therefore, the
2 undersigned may exercise jurisdiction to conduct all proceedings in this matter, including the
3 entry of judgment.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s consent or decline form, filed December 12, 2016, is HEREBY
4
5 DISREGARDED.
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9 Dated:
December 14, 2016
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?