Luna et al v. County of Kern et al
Filing
204
ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/30/2018. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
OSCAR LUNA, et al.,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
Case No.: 1:16-cv-00568 DAD JLT
ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT
v.
COUNTY OF KERN, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
The Court conducted a settlement conference in this case on May 28,2018 at which the parties
17
18
tentatively reached terms of settlement, pending approval by the Kern County Board of Supervisors.
19
The Kern County Board of Supervisors has now approved the settlement. Thus, the matter has
20
settled. Therefore, the Court ORDERS:
1.
21
22
No later than April 2, 2018, the parties will file a stipulated request for dismissal of
the individual defendants;
2.
23
No later than June 18, 2018, the parties will file a stipulated request for dismissal of
24
the entire case. The Court understands that, at that time, the parties will ask the Court to retain
25
jurisdiction through the certification of the November 2018 election which will occur as a result of the
26
settlement. Consequently, the settlement agreement at supporting documents SHALL be attached to
27
the proposed order;
28
///
1
1
2
3
3.
The parties will make all reasonable efforts to comply with the terms of the settlement
pending further order of the Court;
4.
All pending dates (except those set here) conferences and hearings are VACATED.
4
The parties are advised that failure to comply with this order may result in the Court imposing
5
sanctions.
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
March 30, 2018
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?