Luna et al v. County of Kern et al

Filing 30

SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/13/2016. Pleading Amendment Deadline 1/20/2017. Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures 10/4/2016; Non-Expert and Expert 2/10/2017. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 2/20/2017; Hearing by 3/27/2017. Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 4/7/2017; Hearing by 5/16/2017. Settlement Conference set for 3/1/2017 at 01:30 PM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Pretrial Conference set for 6/5/2017 at 03:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. Jury Trial set for 8/29/2017 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

OSCAR LUNA, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

11
v.

12
13

COUNTY OF KERN, et al.,
Defendants.

14
15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:16-cv-00568 DAD JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 1/20/2017
Discovery Deadlines:
Initial Disclosures: 10/4/2016
Non-Expert & Expert: 2/10/2017
Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 2/20/2017
Hearing: 3/27/2017

16
17
18

Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 4/7/2017
Hearing: 5/16/2017

19
20

Settlement Conference:
3/1/2017 1:30 p.m.
510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA

21
22

Pre-Trial Conference:
6/5/2017 at 3:30 p.m.
Courtroom 5

23
24
25

Trial:

26
27
28

I.

Date of Scheduling Conference
September 13, 2016.
1

8/29/2017 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 5
Jury trial: 6-8 days

1

II.

Appearances of Counsel

2

Denise Hulett appeared on behalf of Plaintiff.

3

Christopher Skinnell and Marguerite Leoni appeared on behalf of Defendants.

4

III.

Pleading Amendment Deadline
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or

5
6

motion to amend, no later than January 20, 2017. Any motion to amend the pleading shall be heard by

7

the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, United States District Court Judge.

8

IV.

The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)

9
10

on or before October 4, 2016.
The parties are ordered to complete all discovery as to non-experts and experts no later than

11
12

Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date

February 10, 2017.
The plaintiffs are directed to disclose all expert witnesses in writing, on or before November

13
14

14, 2016, and to disclose any rebuttal experts by January 13, 2017. The defendants are directed to

15

disclose all expert witnesses in writing, on or before December 14, 2016.

16

The written designation of retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed.

17

R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder.

18

Failure to designate experts in compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the

19

testimony or other evidence offered through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts

20
21

and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions

22

included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may

23

include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony. The provisions of Fed. R.

24

Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement disclosures and responses to discovery

25

requests will be strictly enforced.

26

V.

27
28

Pre-Trial Motion Schedule
All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later

than February 20, 2017, and heard on or before March 27, 2017. Non-dispositive motions are heard
2

1

before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge at the United States

2

Courthouse in Bakersfield, California.
No motion to amend or stipulation to amend the case schedule will be entertained unless it

3
4

is filed at least one week before the first deadline the parties wish to extend. Likewise, no written

5

discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned Magistrate Judge. A party

6

with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good faith effort to resolve by

7

agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the moving party promptly

8

shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate Judge. It shall be the

9

obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the court. To schedule

10

this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Susan Hall, at

11

[phone] or via email at [e-mail]. Counsel must comply with Local Rule 251

12

with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice and dropped

13

from the Court’s calendar.

14

All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than April 7, 2017, and heard no later

15

than May 16, 2017, in Courtroom 5 at 8:30 a.m. before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, United States

16

District Court Judge. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and

17

Local Rules 230 and 260.

18

VI.

Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication

19

At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary

20

adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues

21

to be raised in the motion.

22

The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a

23

question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole

24

or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the

25

issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the

26

expense of briefing a motion; and 6) to develop a joint statement of undisputed facts.

27
28

The moving party SHALL initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed
statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement of
3

1

undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may be

2

deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the joint

3

statement of undisputed facts.
In the notice of motion the moving party SHALL certify that the parties have met and conferred

4
5

as ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer. Failure to

6

comply may result in the motion being stricken.

7

VII.

Pre-Trial Conference Date

8

June 5, 2017 at 3:30 p.m. in Courtroom 5 before Judge Drozd.

9

The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).

10

The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,

11

directly to Judge Drozd's chambers, by email at [e-mail].
Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the

12
13

Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference.

14

The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the

15

Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the

16

Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.

17

VIII. Trial Date
August 29, 2017 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 5 before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, United

18
19

States District Court Judge.

20

A.

This is a bench trial.

21

B.

Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 6-8 days.

22

C.

Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of

23

California, Rule 285.

24

IX.

Settlement Conference

25

A Settlement Conference is scheduled for March 1, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. at 510 19th Street,

26

Bakersfield, California. Despite the provisions of Local Rule 270(b), the settlement conference will be

27

conducted by Magistrate Judge Thurston. If any party prefers that the settlement conference be

28

conducted by a judicial officer not already assigned to this case, that party is directed to notify
4

1

the Court no later than 60 days in advance of the scheduled settlement conference to allow

2

sufficient time for another judicial officer to be assigned to handle the conference.

3

Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the case shall

4

appear at the Settlement Conference with the parties and the person or persons having full authority

5

to negotiate and settle the case on any terms1 at the conference. Consideration of settlement is a

6

serious matter that requires preparation prior to the settlement conference. Set forth below are the

7

procedures the Court will employ, absent good cause, in conducting the conference.

8

At least 21 days before the settlement conference, Plaintiff SHALL submit to Defendant via

9

fax or e-mail, a written itemization of damages and a meaningful2 settlement demand which includes a

10

brief explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate. Thereafter, no later than 14 days before the

11

settlement conference, Defendant SHALL respond, via fax or e-mail, with an acceptance of the offer or

12

with a meaningful counteroffer, which includes a brief explanation of why such a settlement is

13

appropriate.

14

If settlement is not achieved, each party SHALL attach copies of their settlement offers to their

15

Confidential Settlement Conference Statement, as described below. Copies of these documents shall

16

not be filed on the court docket.
CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT

17
18

At least five court days before the Settlement Conference, the parties shall submit, directly to

19

Judge Thurston's chambers by e-mail to [e-mail], a Confidential Settlement

20

Conference Statement. The statement should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on

21

any other party, although the parties may file a Notice of Lodging of Settlement Conference

22

Statement. Each statement shall be clearly marked "confidential" with the date and time of the

23

Settlement Conference indicated prominently thereon.

24
25
26
27
28

1

Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement agreements
are subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like shall be represented by a
person or persons who occupy high executive positions in the party organization and who will be directly involved in the
process of approval of any settlement offers or agreements. To the extent possible the representative shall have the
authority, if he or she deems it appropriate, to settle the action on terms consistent with the opposing party's most recent
demand.
2
“Meaningful” means that the offer is reasonably calculated to settle the case on terms acceptable to the offering
party. “Meaningful” does not include an offer which the offering party knows will not be acceptable to the other party.

5

1

The Confidential Settlement Conference Statement shall include the following:

2

A.

A brief statement of the facts of the case.

3

B.

A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon which

4

the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties' likelihood of prevailing on

5

the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in dispute.

6

C.

A summary of the proceedings to date.

7

D.

An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial and trial.

8

E.

The relief sought.

9

F.

The party's position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a history of
past settlement discussions, offers and demands.

10
11

X.

Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other

12

Techniques to Shorten Trial

13

Not applicable at this time.

14

XI.

There are no pending related matters.

15
16
17

Related Matters Pending

XII.

Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

18

and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any

19

amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to efficiently

20

handle its increasing case load and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow both the Federal

21

Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of California.

22

XIII. Effect of this Order

23

The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most

24

suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the

25

parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered

26

to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by

27

subsequent status conference.

28
6

1

The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a

2

showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations

3

extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by

4

affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause

5

for granting the relief requested.

6

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.

7
8
9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

September 13, 2016

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7