R.R., et al. v. County of Tulare, et al.

Filing 18

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION OF DEBRA RUIZ FOR APPOINTMENT AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR R.R., A MINOR, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/21/2016. (Kusamura, W)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 6 7 R.R., a minor, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, DEBRA RUIZ, and DEBRA RUIZ, individually and as successor in interest to Ryan Christopher Ruiz Rodriguez, Deceased, 8 9 10 11 Case No: 1:16−CV−00570−AWI−SKO ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION OF DEBRA RUIZ FOR APPOINTMENT AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR R.R., A MINOR Plaintiffs (Doc. 1-3) v. COUNTY OF TULARE, CITY OF FARMERSVILLE, CITY OF VISALIA, and JOHN DOES 1-50, inclusive, 12 13 Defendants. 14 15 ORDER APPOINTING GUARDIAN AD LITEM 16 17 Plaintiff R.R., a minor, filed a complaint on April 22, 2016, through his proposed guardian 18 ad litem, Debra Ruiz, who is also a plaintiff in the action. (Doc. 1.) Ms. Ruiz, the grandmother 19 of minor Plaintiff R.R., also submitted a petition to be appointed as R.R.’s guardian ad litem. 20 (Doc. 1-3.) Minor Plaintiff R.R.’s natural mother, Rebecca Gutierrez, requested that Ms. Ruiz be 21 appointed as R.R.’s guardian ad litem, and submitted a declaration that she is “aware of a 22 potential conflict but have signed a waiver as this is in the best interest for my son.” (Doc. 1-4.) 23 Good cause appears to appoint Plaintiff Debra Ruiz as minor Plaintiff R.R.’s guardian ad 24 litem pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(c)(2). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that Debra Ruiz be APPOINTED as Guardian Ad Litem for R.R. in the above action. 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 Dated: July 21, 2016 /s/ 2 Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?