Reyes v. Flores et al
Filing
156
ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND PARAMETERS AND SCHEDULING PRE-CONFERENCE TELEPHONIC DISCUSSION. Pre-Settlement Conference set for 1/6/2023 at 10:30 AM, Settlement Conference set for 1/13/2023 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta. Settlement statements due 12/30/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 11/9/2022. (Apodaca, P)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ABEL REYES
12
Case No. 1:16-cv-00586-CDB
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
FLORES ET AL.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE AND PARAMETERS AND
SCHEDULING PRE-CONFERENCE
TELEPHONIC DISCUSSION
Settlement Statements due: December 30, 2022
Pre-Settlement Conference: January 6, 2023
Settlement Conference:
January 13, 2023
18
19
20
21
Magistrate Judge Helena Barch-Kuchta will hold a settlement conference on January 13,
22
2023, at 10:30 a.m. Unless the parties request the conference to be in-person, the Court will
23
conduct the settlement conference via video conference.
24
invitation will be distributed the week prior.1 The court has reserved the entire day for this
25
settlement conference and expects the parties will proceed with the settlement conference in good
26
27
28
1
The Zoom settlement conference
Any difficulties concerning Zoom video conference, or connecting to the Zoom video conference,
shall immediately be reported to Patricia Apodaca, Courtroom Deputy for the Hon. Helena BarchKuchta, United States Magistrate Judge, at papodaca@caed.uscourts.gov.
1
faith and attempt to resolve all or part of the case. If any party believes that the settlement
2
conference will not be productive, that party shall so inform the court as far in advance of the
3
settlement conference as possible.
4
Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the court, the following individuals must attend
5
the settlement conference in person: (1) all of the attorney(s) who will try the case; and (2)
6
individuals with full authority to negotiate and settle the case, on any terms. See Local Rule 270(f).
7
Whether one or more of the named defendants’ attendance will be required will be discussed at
8
the January 6, 2023, Pre-Settlement Telephone Conference.
9
No later than December 30, 2022, each party must submit to Judge Barch-Kuchta’s
10
chambers at hbkorders@caed.uscourts.gov or by mail at U.S. District Court, P.O. Box 575,
11
Yosemite National Park, CA 95389, a settlement conference statement. These statements should
12
neither be filed on the docket nor served on any other party.
13
In compliance with Local Rule 270(d)-(e), the settlement statements will be used
14
exclusively for the undersigned to prepare for and conduct the settlement conference. They will
15
not become part of the case file and will be shred thereafter under Local Rule 270(e). If applicable,
16
the statements should be marked “CONFIDENTIAL.” See Local Rule 270(d).
The statements should not exceed ten (10) pages and should include:
17
(1) a brief recitation of the facts;
18
(2) a discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the case, including the parties’ relevant
19
20
21
position on the factual and legal issues and brief review of the evidence to support the parties’
factual position;
(3) an itemized estimate of the expected costs for further discovery, pretrial, and trial
22
23
matters, in specific dollar terms;
(4) your best estimate of the probability that plaintiff will prevail should this case proceed
24
to trial;
25
(5) your best estimate of the damages or relief plaintiff may recover should this case proceed
26
to trial and plaintiff prevail (in specific dollar terms and/or injunctive relief, if applicable);
27
(6) a history of settlement discussions (including a listing of any current settlement offers
28
2
1
from any party, in specific dollar terms), a candid statement of your party’s current position on
2
settlement, including the amount that you will give/accept to settle (in specific dollar terms), and
3
a statement of your expectations for settlement discussions;
(7) a list of the individuals who will be attending the settlement on the party’s behalf,
4
5
including names and, if appropriate, titles.
6
At the outset of the settlement conference, the undersigned may call upon the parties’
7
counsel to give a brief (five-minute) opening presentation outlining the factual and legal highlights
8
of their case before the parties break into separate caucuses. The undersigned reserves the right to
9
dispense with the opening presentations of counsel if the undersigned determines that such
10
presentations are not likely to be productive.
11
Notwithstanding the provisions of Federal Rule of Evidence 408, all statements made by
12
the parties relating to the substance or merits of the case, whether written or oral, made for the first
13
time during the settlement conference will be deemed to be confidential and shall not be admissible
14
in evidence for any reason in the trial of the case, should the case not settle. This provision does
15
not preclude admissibility in other contexts, such as pertaining to a motion for sanctions regarding
16
the settlement conference.
Judge Barch-Kuchta will hold a short, pre-settlement conference telephone discussion on
17
18
19
20
21
22
January 6, 2023 at 10:30 a.m. (dial-in number: 1-888-204-5984; passcode: 4446176). Only the
lead attorney from each side2 should participate. At Judge Barch-Kuchta’s discretion, the joint
telephonic discussion may be followed by private telephonic discussions between the judge and
each party.
Dated:
November 9, 2022
HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
23
24
25
26
27
2
28
The Court expects that the attorneys participating in the telephone discussion will also participate in the
settlement conference.
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?