Reyes v. Flores et al
Filing
61
ORDER Setting Settlement Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 03/25/2019. Settlement Conference set for 5/17/2019 at 09:00 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Confidential Settlement Conference Statement due April 10, 2019.(Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ABEL P. REYES,
11
12
13
Plaintiffs,
v.
M. FLORES,
14
Defendants.
15
16
) Case No.: 1:16-cv-00586 DAD JLT
)
) ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT
) CONFERENCE
)
)
)
)
)
)
As a matter of policy, Judge Drozd requires all parties to engage in a formal settlement
17
conference regardless of whether they believe a settlement conference is likely to yield a
18
compromise. Thus, the Court sets a settlement conference on May 17, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. and
19
ORDERS:
20
21
22
1.
The plaintiff will appear by telephone. Defense counsel may appear by telephone,
if he files a request to do so by May 10, 2019;
2.
Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorney who will try
23
the case SHALL appear at the Settlement Conference with the parties and the person or
24
persons having authority to negotiate and settle the case on any reasonable terms1discussed at
25
the conference.
26
3.
Consideration of settlement is a serious matter that requires preparation prior to
27
28
1
Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement
agreements are subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like may be
represented by a person whose recommendations about settlement are relied upon by the ultimate decision makers.
1
the settlement conference. Set forth below are the procedures the Court will employ, absent
2
good cause, in conducting the conference.
3
a.
No later than April 12, 2019, the plaintiff SHALL submit to the
4
defendant via fax or e-mail, a written itemization of damages and a meaningful2 settlement
5
demand which includes a brief explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate. Thereafter,
6
no later than April 26, 2019, the defendant SHALL respond via fax or e-mail, with an
7
acceptance of the offer or with a meaningful counteroffer, which includes a brief explanation of
8
why such a settlement is appropriate. If it appears productive, the parties SHALL continue to
9
exchange offers until settlement is achieved, or it appears settlement cannot be achieved absent
10
11
the Court’s assistance.
If settlement is not achieved through this exchange, each party SHALL attach copies of
12
their settlement offers to their Confidential Settlement Conference Statement, as described
13
below. Copies of these documents shall not be filed on the court docket.
14
b.
No later than April 10, 2019, the defense shall submit by e-mail to
15
JLTOrders@caed.uscourts.gov, a confidential settlement conference statement. So that it is
16
received no later than April 10, 2019, the plaintiff SHALL submit his settlement conference
17
statement to:
18
United States Courthouse
19
510 19th Street, Suite 200
20
Bakersfield, CA 93301
21
The statements should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court and need not be served
22
on any other party. The parties may file a Notice of Lodging of Settlement Conference
23
Statement. Each statement shall be clearly marked “confidential” with the date and time of the
24
Settlement Conference indicated prominently thereon.
25
c.
The confidential settlement conference statement shall include the
26
following:
27
“Meaningful” means the offer is reasonably calculated to settle the case on terms acceptable to the other
party. “Meaningful” does not include an offer which the offering party knows will not be acceptable to the opponent.
In making the meaningful offers, the parties should consider the evidence as well as the risk that the jury will not find
in their favor.
28
2
1
1.
A brief statement of the facts of the case.
2
2.
A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other
3
grounds upon which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties' likelihood of
4
prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in dispute.
5
3.
A summary of the proceedings to date.
6
4.
An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery,
7
pretrial and trial.
8
5.
The relief sought.
9
6.
The party's position on settlement, including present demands and offers
10
and a history of past settlement discussions, offers and demands.
11
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
March 25, 2019
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?