Reyes v. Flores et al

Filing 85

TENTATIVE PRETRIAL ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 08/19/2019. Fourteen-Day Deadline. (Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ABEL P. REYES,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 1:16-cv-00586-DAD-JLT (PC)

v.

TENTATIVE PRETRIAL ORDER

M. FLORES,

15

Defendant.

16
On August 13, 2019, the court conducted a final pretrial conference. Plaintiff Abel Reyes

17
18

(“plaintiff”) appeared telephonically and pro se. Deputy Attorney General Matthew Roman

19

appeared telephonically as counsel for defendant M. Flores, LVN (“defendant”). Having

20

considered the parties’ pretrial statements and their views, the court issues this tentative pretrial

21

order.
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought

22
23

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendant knowingly denied him

24

constitutionally adequate medical treatment and was deliberately indifferent to his serious

25

medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment.

26

I.

JURISDICTION/VENUE

27

Jurisdiction is predicated on 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343. Jurisdiction is not contested.

28

Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391. Venue is not contested.
1

1

II.

2
3

Both parties have demanded a jury trial. The jury will consist of seven jurors.
III.

4
5

JURY

UNDISPUTED FACTS
1.

In January 2014, plaintiff was incarcerated at California State Prison-Corcoran

(“CSP-Corcoran”).

6

2.

Following a history of treatment for various urinary symptoms, the plaintiff was

7

admitted into the Delano Regional Medical Center for transurethral resection of the prostate

8

(“TURP”) surgery on January 21, 2014.

9

3.

Plaintiff was discharged and returned to CSP-Corcoran on January 23, 2014.

10

4.

On January 26, 2014, at approximately 7:00 a.m., plaintiff was pushed in his

11

wheelchair to the C window of the 3-B Clinic to obtain his morning medications. Plaintiff told

12

defendant that he was in severe pain and that he had a medical emergency. Defendant stated that

13

it was not a medical emergency and told plaintiff to submit a health care services request form to

14

be seen.

15

5.

At approximately 11:30 a.m., plaintiff returned to the 3-B Clinic where he was

16

seen by defendant. Plaintiff told defendant of his continuing pain, and that he was unable to

17

urinate, had thick blood clots come out of his penis, and that he had just had surgery and needed

18

medical attention. Defendant assessed plaintiff and concluded that he did not need immediate

19

medical attention.

20

6.

At approximately 3:45 p.m., plaintiff again returned to the 3-B Clinic. At that

21

time, another nurse examined plaintiff and again concluded that he did not require emergency

22

treatment.

23

7.

24

Later that evening, plaintiff was examined in the Acute Care Hospital at CSP-

Corcoran by Dr. Julian Kim.

25

8.

Afterwards, plaintiff was sent to the Mercy Hospital Emergency Room, where he

26

was examined by Dr. Noor Jaber. Plaintiff had a catheter inserted and was admitted to the

27

hospital. Plaintiff was discharged from the hospital on January 29, 2014.

28

/////
2

1

IV.

DISPUTED FACTUAL ISSUES

2

1.

Whether defendant was deliberately indifferent to the plaintiff’s medical needs.

3

2.

Whether the plaintiff suffered any later medical complications as a result of the

4
5

alleged delay in providing him medical care.
V.

6

DISPUTED EVIDENTIARY ISSUES/MOTIONS IN LIMINE
The parties have not yet filed motions in limine. The court does not encourage the filing

7

of motions in limine unless they are addressed to issues that can realistically be resolved by the

8

court prior to trial and without reference to the other evidence which will be introduced by the

9

parties at trial. The parties anticipate filing the motions in limine below. Any motions in limine

10

counsel elects to file shall be filed no later than 21 days before trial. Opposition shall be filed no

11

later than 14 days before trial and any replies shall be filed no later than 10 days before trial.

12

Upon receipt of any opposition briefs, the court will notify the parties if it will hear argument on

13

any motions in limine prior to the first day of trial.

14

Plaintiff’s Motions in Limine

15

1.

Motion in limine to bar defendant from presenting evidence of or making reference

16

to plaintiff’s criminal history, the criminal history of plaintiff’s witnesses, plaintiff’s history of

17

administrative appeals and litigation unrelated to this instant lawsuit, and any documents not

18

previously disclosed to plaintiff.

19

2.

Motion in limine to bar testimony of defendant’s expert witnesses if it is revealed

20

through deposition that their opinions are based in whole or in part on materials that should have

21

been produced during discovery and which were withheld from plaintiff.

22

3.

23

Defendant’s Motions in Limine

24

1.

Plaintiff anticipates objecting to defendant’s proposed trial exhibits.

Defendant states that he objects to the introduction of testimony by plaintiff

25

including but not limited to, type of treatment, rationale for treatment, and appropriateness of

26

treatment, and causation of subsequent medical conditions.

27

/////

28

/////
3

1

VI.

SPECIAL FACTUAL INFORMATION

2

Special factual information pursuant to Local Rule 281(b)(6) is not applicable to this

3

action.

4

VII.

5

RELIEF SOUGHT
Plaintiff seeks compensatory damages in the amount of $300,000.00 and punitive

6

damages in the amount of $100,000.00.

7

VIII.

8
9

POINTS OF LAW
The claims and defenses arise under federal law. All of plaintiff’s claims are brought

against defendant M. Flores.

10

1. The elements of, standards for, and burden of proof in a cause of action for deliberate

11

indifference to a prisoner’s right to medical care pursuant to the Eighth Amendment.

12

2. The elements of, standards for, and burden of proof for an award of punitive damages.

13

Trial briefs addressing the points of law implicated by these remaining claims shall be

14

filed with this court no later than 7 days before trial in accordance with Local Rule 285.

15

ANY CAUSES OF ACTION OR AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES NOT EXPLICITLY

16

ASSERTED IN THE PRETRIAL ORDER UNDER POINTS OF LAW AT THE TIME IT

17

BECOMES FINAL ARE DISMISSED AND DEEMED WAIVED.

18

IX.

19
20

None.
X.

21
22

ABANDONED ISSUES

WITNESSES
Plaintiff’s witnesses shall be those listed in Attachment A. Defendant’s witnesses shall

be those listed in Attachment B. Each party may call any witnesses designated by the other.

23

A.

The court does not allow undisclosed witnesses to be called for any purpose,

24

including impeachment or rebuttal, unless they meet the following criteria:

25

(1)

The party offering the witness demonstrates that the witness is for the

26

purpose of rebutting evidence that could not be reasonably anticipated at

27

the pretrial conference, or

28

/////
4

1

(2)

2

The witness was discovered after the pretrial conference and the proffering
party makes the showing required in paragraph B, below.

3

B.

Upon the post pretrial discovery of any witness a party wishes to present at trial,

4

the party shall promptly inform the court and opposing parties of the existence of

5

the unlisted witnesses so the court may consider whether the witnesses shall be

6

permitted to testify at trial. The witnesses will not be permitted unless:

7

(1)

8

The witness could not reasonably have been discovered prior to the
discovery cutoff;

9

(2)

10

The court and opposing parties were promptly notified upon discovery of
the witness;

11

(3)

If time permitted, the party proffered the witness for deposition; and

12

(4)

If time did not permit, a reasonable summary of the witness’s testimony

13
14

was provided to opposing parties.
XI.

15

EXHIBITS, SCHEDULES, AND SUMMARIES
Joint exhibits are listed in Attachment C. At trial, joint exhibits shall be identified as JX

16

and listed numerically, e.g., JX-1, JX-2. At the moment, the parties have not designated any joint

17

exhibits.1

18

Plaintiff’s exhibits are listed in Attachment D. Defendant’s exhibits are listed in

19

Attachment E. No exhibit shall be marked with or entered into evidence under multiple exhibit

20

numbers, and the parties are hereby directed to meet and confer for the purpose of designating

21

joint exhibits. All exhibits must be pre-marked as discussed below. At trial, joint exhibits shall be

22

identified as JX and listed numerically, e.g., JX-1, JX-2. Plaintiff’s exhibits shall be listed

23

numerically and defendants’ exhibits shall be listed alphabetically. All exhibits must be pre-

24

marked. The parties must prepare three (3) separate exhibit binders for use by the court at trial,

25

with a side tab identifying each exhibit in accordance with the specifications above. Each binder

26

shall have an identification label on the front and spine. The parties must exchange exhibits no

27
28

1

The parties are directed to confer about creating a joint exhibit list, which can be submitted as
an objection to this pretrial order.
5

1

later than 28 days before trial. Any objections to exhibits are due no later than 14 days before

2

trial. The final exhibits are due the Thursday before the trial date, which is October 24, 2019. In

3

making any objection, the party is to set forth the grounds for the objection. As to each exhibit

4

which is not objected to, it shall be marked and received into evidence and will require no further

5

foundation.

6
7

The court does not allow the use of undisclosed exhibits for any purpose, including
impeachment or rebuttal, unless they meet the following criteria

8

A.

9

The court will not admit exhibits other than those identified on the exhibit lists
referenced above unless:

10

(1)

The party proffering the exhibit demonstrates that the exhibit is for the

11

purpose of rebutting evidence that could not have been reasonably

12

anticipated, or

13

(2)

14

The exhibit was discovered after the issuance of this order and the
proffering party makes the showing required in paragraph B, below.

15

B.

Upon the discovery of exhibits after the discovery cutoff, a party shall promptly

16

inform the court and opposing parties of the existence of such exhibits so that the

17

court may consider their admissibility at trial. The exhibits will not be received

18

unless the proffering party demonstrates:

19

(1)

The exhibits could not reasonably have been discovered earlier;

20

(2)

The court and the opposing parties were promptly informed of their

21

existence;

22

(3)

The proffering party forwarded a copy of the exhibits (if physically

23

possible) to the opposing party. If the exhibits may not be copied the

24

proffering party must show that it has made the exhibits reasonably

25

available for inspection by the opposing parties

26
27
28

XII.

DISCOVERY DOCUMENTS
The parties must lodge the sealed original copy of any deposition transcript to be used at

trial with the Clerk of the Court no later than 14 days before trial.
6

1

Plaintiff and defendant may use the following discovery documents at trial:

2

1.

Defendant’s answers to plaintiff’s Requests for Admissions, Set One, numbers 1-

2.

Defendant’s answers to plaintiff’s First Request for Production of Documents,

3

19;

4
5

numbers 1-8;

6

3.

Defendant’s answers to plaintiff’s First Special Interrogatories, numbers 1-5;

7

4.

Plaintiff’s objections and responses to defendant’s First Set of Request for

8

Production of Documents, numbers 1-7;

9

5.

10

Interrogatories;

11

6.

12

XIII.

Plaintiff’s objections and responses to defendant’s First Set of Special

Transcript of plaintiff’s deposition.

FURTHER DISCOVERY OR MOTIONS

13

Plaintiff anticipates filing a motion for the attendance of incarcerated witness, motion for

14

appointment of counsel, and motions in limine. Defendant does not anticipate further discovery

15

motions. The court notes that under the scheduling order in this case, both discovery and

16

substantive law and motion is now closed.

17

XIV. STIPULATIONS

18
19

None.
XV.

20
21

AMENDMENTS/DISMISSALS
None.

XVI. SETTLEMENT

22

A settlement conference was held before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on May

23

17, 2019, but the parties did not reach a settlement. The court will not require the parties to

24

participate in another court–supervised settlement conference but would schedule a further

25

settlement conference prior to trial if both parties agreed such a conference might be productive

26

and requested that one be set.

27

/////

28

/////
7

1
2
3

XVII. JOINT STATEMENT OF THE CASE
The court has drafted the following neutral statement of the case to be read to the
prospective jurors:

4

Plaintiff is a state prisoner at California State Prison – Corcoran and
claims that defendant, a medical professional at the prison,
knowingly denied him medical treatment and was deliberately
indifferent to his serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth
Amendment. Defendant denies that he was deliberately indifferent
to plaintiff’s medical needs.

5
6
7
8

The parties are directed to raise any objection to this neutral statement of the case in any

9

objections they file to this tentative Pretrial Order.

10
11
12
13

XVIII. SEPARATE TRIAL OF ISSUES
None.
XIX. IMPARTIAL EXPERTS/LIMITATION OF EXPERTS
Plaintiff requests that the court appoint an impartial expert in this action to provide expert

14

testimony regarding the physical injuries to his kidney and problems with a cyst and physical

15

injuries to his testicular epididymal cysts and a sudden swelling in both testicles.

16

The court has discretion pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 706 “to appoint a neutral

17

expert on its own motion, or on the motion of any party” after evaluating “such factors as the

18

complexity of the matters to be determined and the court’s need for a neutral, expert review.”

19

Honeycutt v. Snider, No. 3:11-CV-00393-RCJ, 2011 WL 6301429, at *1 (D. Nev. Dec. 16, 2011).

20

“[T]he most important question a court must consider when deciding whether to appoint a neutral

21

expert witness is whether doing so will promote accurate factfinding.” Gorton v. Todd, 793 F.

22

Supp. 2d 1171, 1179 (E.D. Cal. 2011.) The appointment of a neutral expert witness under Rule

23

706 is intended to benefit the trier of fact, and not a particular litigant. Faletogo v. Moya, No.

24

12cv631 GPC (WMC), 2013 WL 524037, at *1 (S.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2013); Bontemps v. Lee, No.

25

2:12–cv–0771 KJN P, 2013 WL 417790, at *3–4 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2013); Honeycutt, 2011 WL

26

6301429, at *1.

27

Here, the issues presented at trial do not appear to be sufficiently complex to warrant the

28

appointment of a neutral medical expert. The magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations
8

1

with respect to defendant’s motion for summary judgment found that “triable issues of fact exist

2

as to whether Defendant could have and should have called an RN [registered nurse] or physician

3

during their interactions at the C-window, and whether Defendant properly relayed all of

4

Plaintiff’s symptoms and vital statistics as reflected in the 7362 form to the RN on the phone on

5

January 26, 2014 . . . .” (Doc. No. 48 at 16.) The court’s docket is comprised of an

6

overwhelming number of civil rights cases filed by prisoners proceeding pro se and in forma

7

pauperis, and the facts of this case are similar to many cases now pending before the court. See

8

Wilds v. Gines, No. C 08–03348 CW (PR), 2011 WL 737616, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2011);

9

Honeycutt, 2011 WL 6301429, at *1 (“The appointment of experts in deliberate indifference

10

cases is rare, and such requests should be granted sparingly, particularly given the large volume

11

of cases in which indigent prisoners allege claims under the Eighth Amendment related to

12

medical care, and the substantial expense defendants may have to bear if courts were to appoint

13

experts in such cases.”) Therefore, plaintiff’s request for the court to appoint a neutral medical

14

expert to assist the trier of fact is denied at this time.

15

XX.

ATTORNEYS’ FEES

16

Currently, plaintiff is representing himself pro se and is not entitled to move for an award

17

of attorney fees if he prevails. See Gonzalez v. Kangas, 814 F.2d 1411, 1411 (9th Cir. 1987) (pro

18

se prisoner, who is not an attorney, may not obtain an award of attorneys’ fees in his 42 U.S.C. §

19

1983 action).

20

XXI. TRIAL PROTECTIVE ORDER AND REDACTION OF TRIAL EXHIBITS

21
22

Neither party anticipates the need for a trial protective order.
XXII. MISCELLANEOUS

23
24

None.
XXIII. ESTIMATED TIME OF TRIAL/TRIAL DATE

25

Jury trial is set for October 29, 2019, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 5 before the Honorable

26

Dale A. Drozd. Trial is anticipated to last four days. The parties are directed to Judge Drozd’s

27

standard procedures available on his webpage on the court’s website.

28

/////
9

1

As noted by the court during the pretrial conference, there are several other trials

2

scheduled in this period that take priority over this case, thus presenting the likelihood that the

3

starting date of this trial may be delayed. Counsel for defendant are directed to call Jami Thorp,

4

courtroom deputy, at [phone], one week prior to trial to ascertain the status of the trial

5

date. Because plaintiff is incarcerated, the court will also issue minute orders in this case to

6

update the parties on the status of the trial date.

7

XXIV. PROPOSED JURY VOIR DIRE AND PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS

8
9

The parties shall file any proposed jury voir dire 7 days before trial. Each party will be
limited to fifteen minutes of supplemental jury voir dire.

10

The court directs the parties to confer in an attempt to generate a joint set of jury

11

instructions and verdicts. The parties shall file any such joint set of instructions 14 days before

12

trial, identified as “Joint Jury Instructions and Verdicts.” To the extent the parties are unable to

13

agree on all or some instructions and verdicts, their respective proposed instructions are due 14

14

days before trial.

15

Counsel shall e-mail a copy of all proposed jury instructions and verdicts, whether agreed

16

or disputed, as a Word document to [e-mail] no later than 14 days before

17

trial; all blanks in form instructions should be completed and all brackets removed. Plaintiff

18

shall file any such submissions.

19

Objections to proposed jury instructions must be filed 7 days before trial; each objection

20

shall identify the challenged instruction and shall provide a concise explanation of the basis for

21

the objection along with citation of authority. When applicable, the objecting party shall submit

22

an alternative proposed instruction on the issue or identify which of his or her own proposed

23

instructions covers the subject.

24

XXV. TRIAL BRIEFS

25
26
27
28

As noted above, trial briefs are due 7 days before trial
XXVI. OBJECTIONS TO PRETRIAL ORDER
Each party is granted 14 days from the date of this order to file objections to the same.
Each party is also granted 7 days thereafter to respond to the other party’s objections. If no
10

1

objections are filed, the order will become final without further order of this court.

2

The parties are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil

3

Procedure and Local Rule 283 of this court, this order shall control the subsequent course of this

4

action and shall be modified only to prevent manifest injustice.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7

Dated:

August 19, 2019
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
11

ATTACHMENT A: Plaintiff’s Witness List 2, 3

1
2

1.

3
4

93212, [phone]
2.

5
6

G. Andrade, Supervising Registered Nurse II, CSP-Cor, 4001 King Ave., Corcoran, CA

B. Whitfield, Licensed Vocational Nurse, CSP-Cor, 4001 King Ave., Corcoran, CA
93212, [phone]

3.

7

S, Macelvaine, Supervising Registered Nurse III, CSP-Cor, 4001 King Ave., Corcoran,
CA 93212, [phone]

8

4.

Teresa Macias, CEO, CSP-Cor, 4001 King Ave., Corcoran, CA 93212, [phone]

9

5.

Alford, Correctional Officer 2/W, CSP-Cor, 4001 King Ave., Corcoran, CA 93212, (559)

10
11

992-8800
6.

12
13

J. Huewe, Correctional Officer 2/W, CSP-Cor, 4001 King Ave., Corcoran, CA 93212,
[phone]

7.

14

E. Cortez, Correctional Officer 3/W, CSP-Cor, 4001 King Ave., Corcoran, CA 93212,
[phone]

15

8.

Johnny Quezada, (incarcerated witness), CDC# V-42893

16

9.

Julian Kim, M.D., CSP-Cor, 4001 King Ave., Corcoran, CA 93212, [phone]

17

10.

Miss Campbell, Registered Nurse, Delano Regional Medical Hospital, 1401 Garces

18
19

Highway, Delano, CA 93216, [phone]
11.

20
21

Bakersfield, CA 93301
12.

22
23

26
27
28

Mushtaq Ahmed, M.D., CHW Central California, Mercy Hospital, 2215 Truxton Ave.,
Bakersfield, CA 93301

13.

24
25

Jaber Noor, M.D., CHW Central California, Mercy Hospital, 2215 Truxton Ave.,

Anthony H. Horan, M.D. (urologist surgeon), Delano Regional Medical Hospital, 1401
Garces Highway, Delano, CA 93216, [phone]

2

Though not listed on his witness list, plaintiff is not prohibited from questioning defendant in
his case in chief.
3

Whether plaintiff has met the standards and requirements to subpoena any of these witnesses or
to have any incarcerated witnesses transported to appear in this trial will be addressed via separate
order(s).
12

1

14.

Abel P. Reyes, Plaintiff, CDC # P-55763

2

15.

Perkin Hugh, M.D., Twin Cities Community Hospital, 1100 Las Tablas Rd., Templeton,

3
4

CA 93465, [phone]
16.

5
6
7

Ziomek, M.D., John J. ED Physician, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 2615 Chester
Ave., Bakersfield, CA 93301, [phone]

17.

Snyder Alissa K. M.D., Mercy Hospitals of Bakersfield, 2215 Truxton Ave., Bakersfield,
CA 93301.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
13

1
2

ATTACHMENT B: Defendant’s Witness List
1.

3
4

Plaintiff, Abel P. Reyes, California Men’s Colony – East, P.O. Box 8101, San Luis
Obispo, CA 93409

2.

Defendant, Nurse M. Flores, Licensed Vocational Nurse, c/o Matthew W. Roman;

5

California Office of the Attorney General, 1300 I Street, 12th Floor, Sacramento, CA

6

95814

7

3.

of the Attorney General, 1300 I Street, 12th Floor, Sacramento, CA 95814

8
9

4.

5.

12
13

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

28

Correctional Officer E. Cortez, c/o Matthew W. Roman; California Office of the Attorney
General, 1300 I Street, 12th Floor, Sacramento, CA 95814

12.

Correctional Officer Alford, c/o Matthew W. Roman; California Office of the Attorney
General, 1300 I Street, 12th Floor, Sacramento, CA 95814

26
27

Correctional Officer J. Huewe, c/o Matthew W. Roman; California Office of the Attorney
General, 1300 I Street, 12th Floor, Sacramento, CA 95814

24
25

Nurse J. Smothermon, c/o Matthew W. Roman; California Office of the Attorney General,
1300 I Street, 12th Floor, Sacramento, CA 95814

22
23

Dr. Anthony Horan, Delano Regional Medical Center, 1205 Garces Highway, Delano, CA
93215, [phone]

20
21

Dr. Albert McBride, Adventist Health, 2701 Chester Ave #202, Bakersfield, CA 93301,
[phone]

18
19

Dr. Conall McCabe, c/o Matthew W. Roman; California Office of the Attorney General,
1300 I Street, 12th Floor, Sacramento, CA 95814

16
17

Dr. Noor Jaber, Mercy Hospital Bakersfield, 2215 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA
93301, [phone]

14
15

Dr. Julian Kim, c/o Matthew W. Roman; California Office of the Attorney General, 1300
I Street, 12th Floor, Sacramento, CA 95814

10
11

Nurse Hamilton, Licensed Vocational Nurse, c/o Matthew W. Roman; California Office

13.

Nurse Campbell, c/o Matthew W. Roman; California Office of the Attorney General, 1300
I Street, 12th Floor, Sacramento, CA 95814
14

1
2

14.

Dr. Mushtaq Ahmed, Mercy Hospital Bakersfield, 2215 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA
93301, [phone]

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
15

1
2

ATTACHMENT C: JOINT EXHIBITS
N/A

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
16

1

ATTACHMENT D: PLAINTIFF’S EXHIBITS

2

1.

Defendant’s declaration, dated December 19, 2017;

3

2.

Plaintiff’s deposition and all exhibits thereto;

4

3.

Affidavit of IM Johnny Quezada;

5

4.

Plaintiff’s signature sample;

6

5.

Plaintiff’s complaint in this action;

7

6.

Defendant’s responses to discovery;

8

7.

Delano Regional Medical Center, Discharge Instructions dated January 22, 2014;

9

8.

Health Care Services Request Form # 0003276 dated January 26, 2014;

10

9.

Matthew W. Roman correspondence dated November 8, 2017;

11

10.

CSP-Cor Final Report of Laboratory Test dated January 26, 2014;

12

11.

Triage & Treatment Services Flow Sheet dated January 26, 2014;

13

12.

EKG dated January 26, 2014;

14

13.

Triage & Treatment Area Progress Note by Julian Kim, M.D. dated January 26, 2014;

15

14.

Emergency Room Report at Mercy Hospital in Bakersfield, CA, by Noor Jaber, M.D.

16
17

Admit date January 26, 2014;
15.

18

Mercy Hospital Laboratory Specimen Inquiry, Dated January 26, 2014, ORDERED:
UA/CULT;

19

16.

Mercy Hospital Laboratory Test, dated January 26, 2014, ORDERED: CBC Auto Diff.;

20

17.

Mercy Hospital Laboratory Test, dated January 26, 2014, ORDERED: PT, PTT;

21

18.

Inmate Consultation, date of consultation January 26, 2014;

22

19.

Mercy Hospital Inmate Consultation, date of consultation January 27, 2014, by Shabbir

23

Shakir, M.D.;

24

20.

Mercy Hospital Inmate Discharge Summary, date of discharge January 29, 2014;

25

21.

Mercy Hospital Physician Discharge Summary dated January 29, 2014;

26

22.

Discharge to Infirmary;

27

23.

California Correctional Health Care Services Physician’s Admission Orders dated January

28

29, 2014;
17

1

24.

Triage & Treatment Services Flow Sheet dated January 29, 2014 of CDCR 7403;

2

25.

Corcoran State Prison Acute Care Hospital Nursing Assessment Form dated January 29,

3

2014;

4

26.

Physician’s Orders CDC 7221 dated January 29, 2014 through February 9, 2014;

5

27.

CDC 7211 Graphic Record dated January 29, 2014 to February 2, 2014;

6

28.

Nursing Care Records dated January 29, 2014 through February 11, 2014;

7

29.

CA. State Prison-COR Final Report of Labs dated January 30, 2014;

8

30.

Physician’s Progress Notes dated January 30, 2014, February 1, 2014 - February 3, 2014,

9
10

February 7, 2014, February 9, 2014 - February 11, 2014;
31.

11
12

February 11, 2014 through February 12, 2014;
32.

13
14

33.

Correctional Health Care services Exam Name: US Bladder Post Void, exam dated
October 24, 2016;

34.

17
18

CA Correctional Health Care Services, Exam Name: US Scrotal, exam dates February 29,
2016 and January 12, 2017;

15
16

Patient Discharge Instructions at John D. Klarich Hospital Corcoran State Prison dated

Plaintiff’s CDCR 602 Health Care Appeal Log #: COR SC14001635 and COR
HC14055491, date submitted: February 22, 2014;

35.

19

CA. State Prison-Corcoran Final Report of Laboratory Test, UA/CULT dated April 9,
2014;

20

36.

CSP-COR Final Report of Lab. Test, UA/CULT dated May 21, 2014;

21

37.

Active Medications as of January 22, 2015;

22

38.

Health Care Services Request Forms dated September 11, 2016, September 7, 2017,

23

September 12, 2017, September 25, 2017, November 8, 2017, November 10, 2017,

24

#5896015 dated November 19, 2017, #5907690 dated February 7, 2018, #5907691 dated

25

February 21, 2018, #6988957 dated November 7, 2018;

26

39.

Urology Consultation, Final report dated July 13, 2016;

27

40.

Triage and Treatment Area Progress Note dated August 29, 2017;

28

41.

Encounter Form dated September 14, 2017;
18

1

42.

Interdisciplinary Progress Notes dated September 27, 2017;

2

43.

Admit/Discharge/Transfer Forms Hospital Transfer Entered on November 10, 2017;

3

44.

Mercy Hospital Bakersfield Emergency Room Visit on November 10, 2017;

4

45.

Progress Notes dated November 28, 2017, November 27, 2018, October 22, 2018,

5

November 13, 2018, and March 12, 2019;

6

46.

Record from Adventist Health Bakersfield Emergency Room Visit on February 5, 2018;

7

47.

California Correctional Health Care Services, Exam Name: US Scrotal, exam date

8

October 30, 2018.

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
19

1
2

ATTACHMENT E: DEFENDANT’S EXHIBITS
1.

3

Declaration of Nurse M. Flores in support of motion for summary judgment and
accompanying exhibits;

4

2.

Prison medical records dated January 8, 2014;

5

3.

Delano Regional Medical Center medical records dated January 21, 2014;

6

4.

Prison medical records dated January 23, 2014;

7

5.

Prison medical records dated January 24, 2014;

8

6.

Prison medical records dated January 26, 2014;

9

7.

Prison medical records dated January 30, 2014;

10

8.

Prison medical records dated January 31, 2014;

11

9.

Prison medical records dated February 6, 2014;

12

10.

Prison medical records dated February 7, 2014;

13

11.

Mercy Hospital Bakersfield medical records dated January 27, 2014;

14

12.

Mercy Hospital Bakersfield medical records dated January 28, 2014;

15

13.

Mercy Hospital Bakersfield medical records dated January 29, 2014;

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
20