Underwood v. Cox et al
Filing
45
ORDER Following Discovery and Status Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 02/13/2018. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
Case No. 1:16-cv-00597-AWI-EPG (PC)
ANDRE UNDERWOOD,
Plaintiff,
ORDER FOLLOWING DISCOVERY AND
STATUS CONFERENCE
v.
R. COX and C. STANLEY,
Defendants.
15
16
Andre Underwood (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
17
pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 12, 2018,
18
the Court held a discovery and status conference. Plaintiff telephonically appeared on his own
19
behalf. Annakarina De La Torre-Fennell and Michelle Angus telephonically appeared on
20
behalf of Defendants.
21
For the reasons stated on the record at the conference, IT IS ORDERED that:
22
1. Regarding certain requests for admissions Plaintiff propounded on Defendants
23
related to authentication of documents, Plaintiff has until February 26, 2018, to send
24
a letter to Defendants that includes a copy of each document that Plaintiff wants
25
Defendants to authenticate. Defendants have twenty-one days from the date they
26
receive the letter to supplement their response to Plaintiff’s discovery requests
27
related to authentication of documents; and
28
2. Defendants have until March 5, 2018, to supplement their response to Plaintiff’s
1
1
interrogatory number eight in light of the following clarification: The disciplinary
2
detention at issue is the type Plaintiff was subjected to as described in the complaint,
3
and the relevant time period is the time period described in Plaintiff’s complaint.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
February 13, 2018
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?