Keller v. N.K.S.P.
Filing
6
ORDER DENYING 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 5/5/2016. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
1:16-cv-00613-EPG (PC)
JOHN KELLER,
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
v.
(Document# 3)
N. K. S. P. ,
Defendant.
16
17
On May 2, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking the appointment of counsel. Plaintiff
18
does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, Rand v. Rowland, 113
19
F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), and the Court cannot require an attorney to represent Plaintiff
20
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(e)(1). Mallard v. United States District Court for the Southern
21
District of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296, 298, 109 S.Ct. 1814, 1816 (1989).
22
exceptional circumstances the Court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to
23
section 1915(e)(1). Rand, 113 F.3d at 1525.
24
However, in certain
Without a reasonable method of securing and compensating counsel, the Court will seek
25
volunteer counsel only in the most serious and exceptional cases.
26
Aexceptional circumstances exist, the district Court must evaluate both the likelihood of success
27
of the merits [and] the ability of the [plaintiff] to articulate his claims pro se in light of the
28
complexity of the legal issues involved.@ Id. (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).
1
In determining whether
1
Plaintiff states that he has an Eighth Grade education, suffers from mental illness, and
2
lacks skills in the law. This alone does not make Plaintiff’s case exceptional. At this early stage
3
in the proceedings, the Court cannot make a determination that Plaintiff is likely to succeed on the
4
merits. Plaintiff filed the Complaint on May 2, 2016, less than a week ago, and the Complaint
5
awaits the Court=s screening required under 28 U.S.C. 1915. Thus, to date the Court has not
6
found any cognizable claims in Plaintiff=s Complaint for which to initiate service of process, and
7
no other parties have yet appeared.
8
prejudice to renewal of the motion at a later stage of the proceedings.
9
10
Therefore, Plaintiff=s motion shall be denied without
For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff=s motion for the appointment of counsel is HEREBY
DENIED, without prejudice.
11
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
May 5, 2016
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?