Hendrik Block v. Vartanian et al

Filing 47

ORDER Overruling Plaintiff's Objections. All discovery in this case may be served via e-mail. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 2/22/2017. (Timken, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

HENDRIK BLOCK,

10

Plaintiff,

11
12
13

ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S
OBJECTIONS
(Doc. 46)

v.
GARY CHRISTIAN, et al.,
Defendants.

14
15

Case No. 1:16-cv-00650-LJO-SKO

_____________________________________/

16
17

Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Objections to the Court’s Scheduling Order

18 (“Objections”), in which Plaintiff “requests that the original Scheduling Order of December 22,
19 2016 . . . be reinstated.” (Doc. 46 at 4.) The Court is not persuaded by Plaintiff’s arguments in the
20

Objections. The Court therefore OVERRULES the Objections, insofar as Plaintiff requests an

21
alteration to the currently operative schedule for this matter. (Id.)
22
23

In the Objections, Plaintiff also requests that “the Court order that all discovery can be

24 served via email” if the Court overrules the Objections. (Id. at 4.) The Court finds that this
25 request has merit. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that all discovery in this case may be served
26 via e-mail.
27
28

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2 Dated:
3

February 22, 2017

/s/

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

.