Bealer v. Secretary of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al

Filing 21

ORDER ADOPTING 16 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and ORDER DENYING 6 Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/17/2017. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

ANTWOINE BEALER,

10

Plaintiff,

11
12
13

CASE NO. 1:16-cv-00671-LJO-MJS (PC)

v.
SECRETARY OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
AND REHABILITAITON, et al.,

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE
RELIEF
(ECF Nos. 6, 16)

14
Defendants.

15
16
17
18

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil

19

rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. No other parties have appeared in

20

the action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

21

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302 of the United States District Court for the

22

Eastern District of California.

23

On

January

17,

2017,

the

Magistrate

Judge

issued

findings

and

a

24

recommendation to deny Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief. (ECF No. 16.) Plaintiff filed

25

no objections, and the time for doing so has passed.1

26
27
28

1

On January 30, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion for a thirty-day extension of time to file objections. (ECF No.
19.) The motion was granted. (ECF No. 20.) Plaintiff nonetheless did not file objections before the
expiration of the extended deadline.

1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has

2

conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

3

Court finds the findings and recommendation to be supported by the record and by

4

proper analysis.

5

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

6

1.

7
8

The findings and recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge on
January 17, 2017 (ECF No. 16) are adopted in full; and

2.

Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 6) is DENIED.

9
10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____

March 17, 2017

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2