Ray Gibson v. Hagerty Insurance Agency et al

Filing 20

ORDER Continuing Initial Schedule Conference: Initial SCHEDULING CONFERENCE is continued to September 1, 2016 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. ORDER Directing Parties to File Consent/Declne Forms . the parties have represented that they would consent to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). Accordingly, no later than August 31, 2016, the parties are ORDERED to file their consent forms indicating whether they consent to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send consent/decline forms to Plaintiff/Cross Defendant Ray Gibson and Cross Defendant Judy Slack. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/10/2016. (Herman, H)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11

RAY GIBSON,

12

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

HAGERTY INSURANCE AGENCY, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

17
18

HAGERTY INSURANCE AGENCY, LLC
and ESSENTIA INSURANCE COMPANY,

19

Defendants/Cross-Complainants,

20

v.

21

RAY GIBSON, JUDY SLACK and ROES 1
through 10,

22
23

24
25
26
27
28

Cross-Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 1:16-cv-00677-DAD-BAM
ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE
Date:
September 1, 2016
Time:
9:30 a.m.
Courtroom: 8 (BAM)

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE
CONSENT/DECLINE FORMS

The Court convened an initial scheduling conference on August 10, 2016. Plaintiff/Cross
Defendant Ray Gibson, proceeding pro se, appeared by telephone. Cross Defendant Judy Slack,
proceeding pro se, appeared by telephone. Counsel Alicia Gurries appeared by telephone on behalf of
Defendants/Cross Complainants Hagerty Insurance Agency and Essentia Insurance Company. During

1

1

the conference, the parties discussed Plaintiff/Cross Defendant Gibson’s mental and physical status,

2

along with efforts by Plaintiff/Cross Defendant Gibson and Cross Defendant Slack to retain legal

3

counsel. Based on this discussion, the Initial Scheduling Conference is HEREBY CONTINUED to

4

September 1, 2016, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before the undersigned. The parties may

5

appear telephonically at the conference by arranging a one-line conference call prior to calling

6

chambers at 559-499-5789. The parties are not required to submit an amended joint scheduling

7

conference report.

8

Additionally, the parties have represented that they would consent to the jurisdiction of the

9

United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). Accordingly, no later than August

10

31, 2016, the parties are ORDERED to file their consent forms indicating whether they consent to the

11

jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send

12

consent/decline forms to Plaintiff/Cross Defendant Ray Gibson and Cross Defendant Judy Slack.

13

14

IT IS SO ORDERED.

15

Dated:

/s/ Barbara

August 10, 2016

16

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AT FRESNO

____________________________________
Plaintiff(s) / Petitioner(s),
vs.

Case No. ________________________

____________________________________
Defendant(s) / Respondent(s).

IMPORTANT:

√ CHECK and SIGN ONLY ONE SECTION OF THIS FORM, THEN RETURN IT

BY ELECTRONIC FILING BY COUNSEL - PRO SE PLAINTIFF TO THE CLERK’S OFFICE NOT LATER THAN 20 DAYS
FOLLOWING YOUR FIRST APPEARANCE, ANSWER OR RESPONSIVE PLEADING.

☐ CONSENT TO JURISDICTION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
In accordance with the provisions of Title 28, U.S.C. Sec. 636 (c)(1), the undersigned hereby
voluntarily consents to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of
final judgment, with direct review by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in the event an appeal is filed.

Dated:

Signature:
Print Name:
( ) Plaintiff / Petitioner

( ) Defendant/Respondent

( ) Counsel for *

☐ DECLINE OF JURISDICTION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pursuant to Title 28, U.S.C. Sec. 636(c)(2), the undersigned acknowledges the availability of a United States Magistrate Judge but
elects to have this case randomly assigned to a United States District Judge.
Dated:

Signature:
Print Name:
( ) Plaintiff / Petitioner

( ) Defendant/Respondent

( ) Counsel for *

* If

representing more than one party, counsel must indicate name of each party responding.