Ray Gibson v. Hagerty Insurance Agency et al
ORDER to File Consent or Decline Form or ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed for Failure to Obey a Court Order and for Failure to Prosecute This Action 54 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/1/17: 14-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. 1:16-cv-00677-DAD-BAM
HAGERTY INSURANCE AGENCY, et
ORDER TO FILE CONSENT OR DECLINE
FORM OR SHOW CAUSE WHY
SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED
FOR FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER
AND FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE THIS
(Doc. No. 54)
On July 25, 2017, the Court held an Initial Scheduling Conference in this action. At the
conference, the parties agreed to consent to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). Accordingly, the Court ordered Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant
Ray Gibson and Cross-Defendant Judy Slack, both of whom are represented by counsel, to file
their consent forms by August 8, 2017. (Doc. No. 54.) To date, consent forms have not been
filed on behalf of Mr. Gibson or Ms. Slack, and the Court has been unable to issue the Scheduling
Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that within fourteen (14) days from the date
of service of this order, Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant Ray Gibson and Cross-Defendant Judy
Slack shall either:
(1) Complete and return an Order re Consent or Request for Reassignment; or
(2) Show cause in writing why sanctions should not be imposed for the failure to comply
with a court order and the failure to prosecute this action.
The failure to respond to this order will result in the imposition sanctions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
September 1, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?