Ray Gibson v. Hagerty Insurance Agency et al
Filing
70
ORDER GRANTING Motion to Extend Stay (Doc. 69). The stay of proceedings in this action is hereby extended for an additional thirty (30) days, through and including May 19, 2018. Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Ray Gibson is ORDERED to either (1) retain new counsel and file a proper notice for substitution or (2) notify the Court of Plaintiff's request to dismiss his action against Defendants on or before May 19, 2018. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/19/2018. (Herman, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
CASE No.: 1:16-cv-00677-BAM
RAY GIBSON,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND
STAY
v.
HAGERTY INSURANCE AGENCY, et
al.,
Defendants.
17
18
19
The Court, having read and reviewed Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Ray Gibson’s ex parte
20
Motion to Extend the Stay; it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The stay of
21
proceedings in this action is hereby extended for an additional thirty (30) days, through and
22
including May 19, 2018. Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Ray Gibson is ORDERED to either (1) retain
23
new counsel and file a proper notice for substitution or (2) notify the Court of Plaintiff’s request
24
to dismiss his action against Defendants on or before May 19, 2018.
25
however, that given the already lengthy delay in this case, any further request for an extension of
26
time will be denied absent a showing of good cause.
27
////
28
////
1
Plaintiff is advised,
1
The Court further CAUTIONS Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Ray Gibson if one of these
2
events does not occur by May 19, 2018, then the Court shall enter an order to show cause as
3
to why the Court should not dismiss Plaintiff Ray Gibson’s case in its entirety.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
April 19, 2018
A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?