Taylor v. Gregory
Filing
37
ORDER requiring Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's 36 Motion for Sanctions signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/16/2017. Defendant's Response due within 14-Days. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
SHAUNTAE TAYLOR,
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
16
Case No.: 1:16-cv-00698-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
SANCTIONS
C/O J. GREGORY,
(ECF No. 36)
Defendant.
17
18
19
20
Plaintiff Shauntae Taylor is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
21
On September 18, 2017 a settlement conference was held in this matter before Magistrate
22
Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe, at which this case settled. (ECF No. 32.) On September 20, 2017, a
23
joint stipulation for dismissal with prejudice was filed, (ECF No. 34), and on September 21, 2017, this
24
case was closed, (ECF No. 35).
25
On November 13, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion for sanctions, arguing that he has not been
26
compensated according to the terms and conditions of the settlement agreement reached between the
27
parties. The Court finds it appropriate to require a response to Plaintiff’s motion.
28
///
1
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Gregory shall file a response to
1
2
Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order. Plaintiff’s
3
reply, if any, shall be filed within seven (7) days following service of a response.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated:
7
November 16, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?