Taylor v. Gregory

Filing 37

ORDER requiring Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's 36 Motion for Sanctions signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/16/2017. Defendant's Response due within 14-Days. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 SHAUNTAE TAYLOR, Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 16 Case No.: 1:16-cv-00698-LJO-SAB (PC) ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS C/O J. GREGORY, (ECF No. 36) Defendant. 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff Shauntae Taylor is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 21 On September 18, 2017 a settlement conference was held in this matter before Magistrate 22 Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe, at which this case settled. (ECF No. 32.) On September 20, 2017, a 23 joint stipulation for dismissal with prejudice was filed, (ECF No. 34), and on September 21, 2017, this 24 case was closed, (ECF No. 35). 25 On November 13, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion for sanctions, arguing that he has not been 26 compensated according to the terms and conditions of the settlement agreement reached between the 27 parties. The Court finds it appropriate to require a response to Plaintiff’s motion. 28 /// 1 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Gregory shall file a response to 1 2 Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order. Plaintiff’s 3 reply, if any, shall be filed within seven (7) days following service of a response. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: 7 November 16, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?