Johnson v. White, et al.

Filing 24

ORDER ADOPTING 23 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Denying Defendants' 17 Motion to Revoke Plaintiff's In Forma Pauperis Status, and Directing Defendants to File a Response to the Complaint within Thirty Days signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 04/26/2017. (Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

VINCE EDWARD JOHNSON,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
C.O. WHITE, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

Case No.: 1:16-cv-00710-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO REVOKE
PLAINTIFF’S IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS,
AND DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A
RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT WITHIN
THIRTY DAYS
[ECF Nos. 17, 23]

Plaintiff Vince Edward Johnson is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

19

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

20

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 6, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

21

Recommendations recommending that Defendants’ motion to revoke Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis

22

status be denied. The Findings and Recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice

23

that objections were to be filed within fourteen days.

24

objections have been filed.

Over fourteen days have passed and no

25

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de

26

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

27

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

The Findings and Recommendations, filed on April 6, 2017, are adopted in full;

3

2.

Defendants’ motion to revoke Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status is denied; and

4

3.

Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Defendants shall file a

5

response to the complaint.

6
7
8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____

April 26, 2017

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2