Neylon et al v. County of Inyo et al

Filing 64

ORDER Closing Case as to Plaintiff Shawn P. Neylon, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/16/2017. (Hall, S)

1

Mark E. Merin (State Bar No. 043849)
Paul H. Masuhara (State Bar No. 289805)

2

LAW OFFICE OF MARK E. MERIN

3
4
5
6
7

1010 F Street, Suite 300
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
MELISSA M. NEYLON and
SHAWN P. NEYLON

8
9
10
11

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Carl L. Fessenden, SBN 161494
Jeffrey A. Nordlander, SBN 308929
350 University Avenue, Suite 200
Sacramento, California 95825
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

12
13

Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF INYO, WILLIAM R. LUTZE, RALPH
DOUGLAS RICHARDS, and MICHAEL DURBIN

14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17
18

MELISSA M. NEYLON, et al.,

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

FRESNO DIVISION
Case No. 1:16-cv-00712-AWI-JLT
[PROPOSED] CLOSING THE CASE AS TO
PLAINTIFF SHAWN P. NEYLON

Plaintiffs,
vs.
COUNTY OF INYO, et al.,
Defendants.

The parties, Plaintiffs Melissa M. Neylon and Shawn P. Neylon (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and
Defendants County of Inyo, William R. Lutze, Ralph Douglas Richards, and Michael Durbin
(collectively, “Defendants”), have stipulated to the dismissal of Plaintiff Shawn P. Neylon and his
associated claim (Ninth Claim for “Loss of Consortium”) from this action, with prejudice, pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).

28
30
31

1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL OF SHAWN P. NEYLON
Neylon v. County of Inyo, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:16-cv-00712-AWI-JLT

1

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41 permits the plaintiff to dismiss an action without a court order

2

“by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P.

3

41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Because all parties who have appeared in the action signed the stipulation (Doc. 79), it

4

“automatically terminate[d] the action.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997).

5

Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action as to Shawn Neylon only.

6
7
8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

August 16, 2017

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
31

2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL OF SHAWN P. NEYLON
Neylon v. County of Inyo, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:16-cv-00712-AWI-JLT