Wilson v. City of Bakersfield, et al.

Filing 16

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed for Failure to Comply with the Court's Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 2/9/2017. Show Cause Response due by 2/17/2017. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL WILSON, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al., 15 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:16-CV-00720 JLT ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDER 16 17 After reviewing the parties’ mid-discovery status conference, the Court ordered counsel to 18 confer as to whether they wished to be referred to the VDRP or would like an early settlement 19 conference and to file a joint report detailing the result of this conference. (Doc. 15) The Court 20 required the report to be filed by January 27, 2017. Id. This did not occur. Thus, the Court ORDERS: 21 22 23 1. No later than February 17, 2017, counsel SHALL show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to comply with the Court’s order; 2. Alternatively, they may file their joint report by February 17, 2017. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 9, 2017 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?