Jose Trujillo v. Petersen et al

Filing 35

ORDER DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to Terminate Certain Cross Claims 34 , signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/25/2016. (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOSE TRUJILLO,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16

No. 1:16-cv-00728-DAD-EPG

v.
MARGARET E. PETERSON, trustee of
the BYPASS TRUST UNDER THE DON
R. PETERSEN AND MARGARET E.
PETERSEN TRUST dated April 29, 1998,
et al.,

17

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE
COURT TO TERMINATE CERTAIN CROSS
CLAIMS
(Doc. No. 34)

Defendants.

18
19

On October 25, 2016, defendant Marcos Guillermo Marin, defendant Margaret E.

20

Peterson, and defendant John F. George filed a joint stipulation dismissing cross claims against

21

each other. (Doc. No. 34.) Specifically, they stipulated:
1) Defendant Marin will dismiss any and all cross-claims arising out of the events or

22
23

occurrences that are the subject of the Trujillo lawsuit, case number 1:16-cv-00728-DAD-

24

EPG, against defendant Peterson, individually or as trustee;
2) Defendant Peterson, individually and as trustee, will, without prejudice, dismiss any and

25
26

all cross-claims arising out of the events or occurrences that are the subject of the Trujillo

27

lawsuit, case number 1:16-cv-00728-DAD-EPG, against defendant Marin;

28

/////
1

1

3) Defendant Marin will dismiss without prejudice any and all cross-claims arising out of the

2

events or occurrences that are the subject of the Trujillo lawsuit, case number 1:16-cv-

3

00728-DAD-EPG, against defendant George; and

4

4) Defendant George will not file any cross-claims arising out of the events or occurrences

5

that are the subject of the Trujillo lawsuit, case number 1:16-cv-00728-DAD-EPG, against

6

defendant Marin.

7

In light of the parties’ stipulation, the aforementioned cross claims are dismissed without

8

prejudice and the Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate them from this action. See Fed. R.

9

Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). As also

10

stipulated to by the parties, any issues and counter claims between Peterson Trust and John

11

George will proceed and this order does not affect the proceedings with respect to issues raised

12

between those parties.

13

IT IS SO ORDERED.

14

Dated:

October 25, 2016
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2