Tyrone Williams v. Fresno County District Attorney Office et al
Filing
14
ORDER DENYING Without Prejudice Plaintiff's Request to Attend Court Proceedings, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 6/29/16. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1:16-cv-00734-DAD-MJS (PC)
TYRONE WILLIAMS,
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT
PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST
TO ATTEND COURT PROCEEDINGS
Plaintiff,
v.
(ECF No. 4)
FRESNO COUNTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, et al.,
Defendants.
17
Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil
18
rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 23, 2016, Plaintiff filed a
19
motion requesting the Court issue an order allowing Plaintiff to attend all court hearings
20
in his case. (ECF No. 4.)
21
The Court recognizes that as a prisoner proceeding pro se, Plaintiff stands at a
22
disadvantage when navigating the litigation process. For that reason, the Court will take
23
24
affirmative steps to ensure that his “access to the courts is adequate, effective, and
meaningful.” Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 958 (9th Cir. 1998) (quoting Bounds v.
25
Smith, 430, U.S. 817, 822 (1977)). However, the Court still has broad discretion to
26
manage the course of litigation, see Hunt v. Cty. of Orange, 672 F.3d 606, 616 (9th Cir.
27
28
2012), and at this point the Court sees no reason to grant Plaintiff’s request.
1
1
Absent an order from the Court stating otherwise, all motions in this case will be
2
decided without oral argument. E.D. Cal. Local Rule 230(l) (“All motions, except motions
3
to dismiss for lack of prosecution, filed in actions wherein one party is incarcerated and
4
proceeding in propria persona, shall be submitted upon the record without oral argument
5
unless otherwise ordered by the Court.”)
6
evaluate the need for Plaintiff to appear in person if and when it arises.
7
8
For all other proceedings, the Court will
For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s request to attend all Court hearings (ECF
No. 4) is HEREBY DENIED.
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
June 29, 2016
/s/
12
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Michael J. Seng
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?