Brown v. Robles et al

Filing 18

ORDER denying 17 Motion for Summary Judgment, without prejudice for failure to provide RAND NOTICE signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/22/2018. 14-Day Filing Deadline. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 QUINCY BROWN, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. R. ROBLES, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:16-cv-00751-SAB (PC) ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE RAND NOTICE [ECF No. 17] FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE Plaintiff Quincy Brown is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On March 5, 2018, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 17.) 20 In Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934, 939 (9th Cir. 2012), the Ninth Circuit held that a pro se 21 prisoner plaintiff must be provided with “fair notice” of the requirements for opposing a motion for 22 summary judgment at the time the motion is brought. Review of the current motion shows that 23 Defendants did not provide Plaintiff with a Rand notice upon the filing of the motion for summary 24 judgment. See Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998). Defendants have failed to provide 25 Plaintiff with the proper required Rand notice. In particular, Defendants failed to file a separate form 26 notice of all the Rand requirements independent of the summary judgment motion or papers filed in 27 support thereof. Rand, 154 F.3d at 960. In addition, Defendants failed to advise Plaintiff of the 28 1 1 contents of any applicable Eastern District of California Local Rule requirements, i.e. Local Rule 260. 2 Id. at 961. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 5 2. Defendants shall file their motion for summary judgment within fourteen (14) days of 6 the date of entry of this order and shall provide Plaintiff with the appropriate Rand 7 notice. 8 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 22, 2018 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?