Sequoia ForestKeeper v. La Price et al

Filing 34

ORDER Requiring Filing of the Administrative Record, Requiring Status Reports and Setting a Status Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/12/2017. Administrative Record due by 3/20/2017. Status reports due by 2/10/2017, 3/3/2017 and 3/31/2017. Status Conference set for 2/17/2017 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 SEQUOIA FORESTKEEPER, et al., 11 12 13 Plaintiffs, v. ERIC LA PRICE, et al., 14 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:16-cv-00759-AWI-JLT ORDER REQUIRING FILING OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD, REQUIRING STATUS REPORTS AND SETTING A STATUS CONFERENCE 15 16 On January 12, 2017, the Court held the scheduling conference but determined, due to 17 outstanding information needed by the U.S. Forest Service, issuing a schedule was not appropriate at 18 this time. Rather, the Court will require the parties to file periodic status report/hearings. Thus, the 19 Court ORDERS: 20 1. 21 22 23 24 No later than February 10, 2017, counsel SHALL file a joint status report detailing the data analysis of the CIB and any known impacts on this litigation that this analysis imposes; 2. The Court sets a status conference on February 17, 2017 at 8:30 a.m. Appearances via CourtCall are authorized; 3. No later than March 3, 2017, counsel SHALL file a joint status report detailing whether 25 there are any impediments to the defendants’ lodging the administrative record on March 20, 2017 and 26 detailing the extent to which the record has been provided to the other parties; 27 4. The administrative records SHALL be lodged no later than March 20, 2017; 28 5. No later than March 31, 2017, counsel SHALL file a joint status report detailing the 1 1 determination of the U.S. Forest Service after considering the CBI data analysis, the impacts, if any, on 2 the positions of the other parties and whether there is disagreement as to whether the administrative 3 record is complete. The status report should also detail whether counsel believe the matter is ready for 4 further scheduling or, if not, why. If they agree the matter should be schedule, they SHALL propose 5 dates for the briefing schedule and SHALL use best efforts to agree on those dates. If there is 6 agreement, the Court may issue the schedule without further hearing. 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 12, 2017 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?