Williams v. Verna et al
Filing
19
ORDER REGARDING Plaintiff's 17 Motion for Status of the Case signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/1/2017. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SHANNON WILLIAMS,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
ANTHONY VERNA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:16-cv-00764-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR STATUS OF THE CASE
[ECF No. 17]
Plaintiff Shannon Williams, a prisoner in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons
18
(“BOP”) proceeding pro se filed the instant civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
19
Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) on June 2, 2016.
20
On September 29, 2016, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and directed that Plaintiff
21
either file an amended complaint or notify the Court of intent to proceed only on the claim found to be
22
cognizable.
23
Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint on November 9, 2016.
24
On February 27, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting the status of the case. As Plaintiff
25
was advised in the First Informational Order, “[t]his Court screens pro se plaintiff’s complaints as
26
expeditiously as possible. However, the Court has an extremely large number of pro se plaintiff civil
27
rights cases pending before it, and delay is inevitable. As long as a party keeps the Court informed of
28
1
1
the party’s current address, the Court will provide notice of all actions which might affect the case as
2
soon as an action is taken in the case.” (ECF No. 2, Order at III (C).) The Court is aware of Plaintiff’s
3
action and will screen the complaint in due course. Plaintiff is advised that the Court will not file or
4
respond in writing to any future requests for status of the case.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
Dated:
8
March 1, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?