Williams v. Verna et al

Filing 40

ORDER DENYING 30 Motion for Summary Judgment ; ORDER ADOPTING 37 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 10/24/18. (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SHANNON WILLIAMS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
ANTHONY VERNA, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:16-cv-00764-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND
DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[ECF Nos. 30, 37]

Plaintiff Shannon Williams, a prisoner in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons

17
18

(“BOP”) proceeding pro se filed the instant civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown

19

Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) on June 2, 2016.

20

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

21

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 10, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

22

Recommendations recommending that Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be denied. The

23

Findings and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that objections were to

24

be filed within twenty-one (21) days. Plaintiff did not file objections and the time to do so has passed.

25

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de

26

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

27

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

The Findings and Recommendations, filed on September 10, 2018, are adopted in full;

2.

Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, filed on March 5, 2018, is denied.

3
4

and

5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7

Dated: October 24, 2018

8

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2