Mitchell v. Security Pacific Bank et al

Filing 6

ORDER GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 4 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 03/7/2017. (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 HURSEL FLOYD MITCHELL, 10 11 12 13 Plaintiff, CASE No. 1:16-cv-00775-AWI-MJS (PC) ORDER DISCHARGING SHOW CAUSE ORDER TO v. (ECF NO. 4) SECURITY PACIFIC BANK, et al., Defendants. ORDER GRANTING MOTION PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS TO 14 (ECF NO. 2) 15 16 17 Plaintiff Hursel Floyd Mitchell is proceeding pro se in this action. On June 3, 18 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 19 1915. (ECF No. 2.) That motion was incomplete as it did not include information 20 regarding Plaintiff’s current income and expenses. Accordingly, on June 9, 2016, the 21 Court ordered Plaintiff to provide additional information. (ECF No. 3.) When Plaintiff 22 failed to comply, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why sanctions should not be 23 imposed. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff responded to the order to show cause on December 28, 24 2016. (ECF No. 5.) 25 In his response, Plaintiff states he is unable to provide the requested information 26 regarding his income due to fraud that appears to be the basis for his underlying claims 27 in this action. Nonetheless, documents attached to the response indicate that Plaintiff is 28 1 1 unable to afford the fees for this litigation and that he is entitled to proceed without 2 prepayment of fees. 3 Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The order to show cause is DISCHARGED; and 5 2. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 7, 2017 /s/ 9 Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?