Martin-Barnett v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 25

Stipulation and Order modifying scheduling order, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 1/8/2018. (Motion for Summary Judgment filed and served by 1/10/2018; Cross Motion for Summary Judgment filed and served by 2/12/2018; Response to Cross Motion due by 2/19/2018) (Rosales, O)

1
2
3
4
5

Robert C Weems (CA SBN 148156)
WEEMS LAW OFFICES
769 Center Blvd., PMB 38
Fairfax, CA 94930
Ph: 415.881.7653
Fx: 866.610.1430

[e-mail]

Attorney for Plaintiff

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

BERNADINE MARTIN-BARNETT,

Case No. 1:16-CV-00780-EPG

Plaintiff,

11

STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING
SCHEDULING ORDER

12

v.

13

NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Defendant.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, subject to the Court’s approval, that
the scheduling order in this action be further modified to extend the parties filing deadlines to file
their respective motions for summary judgment by 5 days, plaintiff’s reply date to remain unchanged.
Modification is necessary, appropriate and in the interests of judicial economy because of
unanticipated demands between January 2, 2018 and January 5, 2018, in plaintiff’s counsel’s
criminal defense calendar, which have interfered with the completion of plaintiff’s motion for
summary judgment, and plaintiff’s counsel believes that this short further extension of time is
necessary to permit the filing and meet the professional standards of the Court.
The parties believe and agree that an equal extension of the filing deadlines for their respective
motions for summary judgment without extension of plaintiff’s reply deadline is appropriate, is not
prejudicial to either party, and should result in minimal disruption to their preparation for the Court’s
hearing in this matter.
Accordingly, the parties agree to and request modification of the existing scheduling order and
outstanding deadlines, as follows:
January 10, 2018:

Plaintiff to file and serve motion for summary judgment.

February 12, 2018:

Defendant to file and serve cross-motion for summary judgment.
1

1
2
3
4

February 19, 2018:

Plaintiff to file and serve response to cross-motion.

SO STIPULATED AND AGREED:
Dated: January 8, 2018

WEEMS LAW OFFICES

/s/ Robert C. Weems

5

Robert C. Weems,
Attorney for Plaintiff

6

10

PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
TINA NAICKER
Special Assistant United States Attorney

11

/s/Tina Naicker

7

Dated: January 8, 2018

8
9

TINA NAICKER
Special Assistant United States Attorney and
Attorney for Defendant (per e-mail
authorization)

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2

1

ORDER

2

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the existing scheduling order and outstanding deadlines are

3

CONTINUED as follows:

4

January 10, 2018:

Plaintiff to file and serve motion for summary judgment.

5

February 12, 2018:

Defendant to file and serve cross-motion for summary judgment.

6

February 19, 2018:

Plaintiff to file and serve response to cross-motion.

7

No further extensions of time will granted in this case.

8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11

Dated:

January 8, 2018

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3