Phou v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 21

STIPULATION and ORDER for Award of Attorney's Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/24/2017. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6

FORSLUND LAW, LLC
Jacqueline A. Forslund # 154575
P.O. Box 4476
Sunriver, OR 97707
Telephone:
541-419-0074
Fax:
541-593-4452
Email:
[e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

JENNIFER SAVEIN PHOU,

)
)
Plaintiff
)
)
v.
)
)
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
)
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
)
)
Defendant
)
)
____________________________________)

Case No. 1:16-CV-00782-GSA
STIPULATION AND
ORDER FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEY’S
FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO
JUSTICE ACT (EAJA)

16

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel,
17
18

subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney’s fees under the Equal
Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. sec. 2412(d), in the amount of ONE THOUSAND FOUR

19

HUNDRED TWENTY FIVE dollars and EIGHTY THREE cents ($1,425.83). This amount

20

represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection

21

with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. sec. 2412(d).

22
23
24

After the Court issues an order for payment of EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff, the
government will consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees and expenses to
Plaintiff’s attorney. The government’s ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the
fees and expenses are subject to an offset allowed under the United States Department of the

25
26

Treasury’s Offset Program pursuant to Astrue v. Ratcliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). After the order of
EAJA fees and expenses is entered, the government will determine if they are subject to an offset. If

27

it is determined that Plaintiff’s EAJA fees and expenses are not subject to an offset under Astrue v.

28

Ratcliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010) and the Department of Treasury’s Offset Program, then the check for
Phou v. Berryhill

Stipulation and Order

E.D. Cal. 1:16-cv-00782-GSA

1

EAJA fees and expenses shall be made payable to Jacqueline A. Forslund, based upon Plaintiff’s

2

assignment of these amounts to Plaintiff’s attorney. The parties agree that whether these checks are

3

made payable to Plaintiff or Jacqueline A. Forslund, such checks shall be mailed to Plaintiff’s

4
5

attorney at the following address: Jacqueline A. Forslund, Forslund Law LLC, P.O. Box 4476,
Sunriver, Oregon 97707. This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request
for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant

6

under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from,

7

and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff’s Counsel may have relating to EAJA

8

attorney fees in connection with this action.

9

Respectfully submitted,

10
11

Date: March 21, 2017

12

JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND
Attorney at Law

13

/s/Jacqueline A. Forslund
JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND
Attorney for Plaintiff

14
15
16

Date: March 22, 2017

17
18

PHILIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration

19

/s/Cynthia B. De Nardi
CYNTHIA B. DE NARDI
Special Assistant United States Attorney
*By email authorization
Attorney for Defendant

20
21
22
23
24
25

///
///
///

26
27
28

///
///
Phou v. Berryhill

Stipulation and Order

E.D. Cal. 1:16-cv-00782-GSA

ORDER

1
2

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties (Doc. 20) Plaintiff’s Counsel is awarded attorney’s

3

fees in the amount of ONE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED TWENTY FIVE dollars and EIGHTY

4

THREE cents ($1,425.83) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. sec. 2412(d).

5

Payment shall be made pursuant to Astrue v. Ratcliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010) and in accordance with

6

the terms of the stipulation outlined above.

7
8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

March 24, 2017

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Phou v. Berryhill

Stipulation and Order

E.D. Cal. 1:16-cv-00782-GSA