Phou v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
3
ORDER DENYING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP and Directing Plaintiff to Pay Filing Fee or Amended Application Within Thirty (30) Days signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 6/7/2016. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
JENIFFER SAVEIN PHOU,
11
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
Case No. 1:16-cv-00782-SMS
ORDER DENYING APPLICATION
TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner Of Social Security,
(Doc. 2)
Defendant.
15
16
17
By motion filed June 5, 2016, Plaintiff Jeniffer Savein Phou, by her attorney, Jacqueline A.
18
Forslund, seeks to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff submitted an application which is
19
incomplete. Specifically, Plaintiff provided no answers concerning her incarceration and
20
employment status. Absent complete information regarding Plaintiff’s financial situation, the Court
21
cannot evaluate whether Plaintiff is sufficiently impoverished to justify proceeding without paying
22
the filing fee for her lawsuit.
23
Additionally, the Court notes Plaintiff did not identify the proper court, provide a case
24
number, and declare her status as the petitioner/plaintiff/movant on her application. If Plaintiff
25
elects to submit an amended application, as this order permits her to do, she must provide a complete
26
application.
27
28
Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff
shall either submit an amended and complete application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the
1
filing fee to the Clerk of the Court within thirty (30) days of this order. If Plaintiff does not pay the
2
filing fee or submit an amended application, the Court shall dismiss the case for lack of prosecution
3
without further notice.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
June 7, 2016
/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?