Mike Murphy's Enterprises, Inc. v. Fineline Industries, LLC

Filing 40

ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT WITHIN FIVE DAYS OF THE DATE OF ENTRY OF THIS ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: The parties shall file a joint status report within five days of the date of entry of this order; and the failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/1/2019. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 MIKE MURPHY’S ENTERPRISES, INC., Case No. 1:16-cv-00784-LJO-SAB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT WITHIN FIVE DAYS OF THE DATE OF ENTRY OF THIS ORDER 13 v. 14 FINELINE INDUSTRIES, LLC, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 On October 31, 2016, Chief Judge Lawrence J. O’Neill granted Defendant’s motion to stay this case pending resolution of Plaintiff’s parallel state court action. (ECF No. 26.) On November 2, 2016, the undersigned ordered the parties to file a status report every ninety days until the stay is lifted and set the deadline for the first status report as January 31, 2017. (ECF No. 27.) On March 28, 2019, the parties filed a status report. (ECF No. 39.) The status report indicated that trial in the matter was complete and the parties were awaiting the judgment of the trial court. (Id.) The parties should have filed a joint status report within ninety days of the March 28, 2019 status report. Therefore, the parties’ joint status report was due on June 28, 2019. However, the parties did not file a status report by the June 28, 2019 deadline. The parties shall file a joint status report within five days of the date of entry of this 28 1 1 order. The parties shall then file a status report every ninety days from the date of filing of the 2 last status report until the stay is lifted. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The parties shall file a joint status report within five days of the date of entry of this order; and 5 2. The failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: July 1, 2019 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?