Palmer v. Iosefa et al

Filing 21

STIPULATION and ORDER CONTINUING DATE TO FILE RESPONSE TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES. Defendants are granted a two-week extension of time for filing a response to the First Amended Complaint for Damages (Doc. 19). Defendants shall file a response to the First Amended Complaint for Damages on or by November 3, 2016. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/16/2016. (Timken, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672
Attorney General of California
PETER A. MESHOT, State Bar No. 117061
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
NELI N. PALMA, State Bar No. 203374
Deputy Attorney General
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants California Highway Patrol
Officer Iosefa, California Highway Patrol Officer
Crewse (erroneously sued herein as “Crelose”), and
California Highway Patrol Officer McConnell

9
10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13
14
ROBERT PALMER,

1:16-cv-00787-DAD-SKO

15
16
v.
17
18
19
20

Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND ORDER
CONTINUING DATE TO FILE
RESPONSE TO FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL
OFFICER IOSEFA; CALIFORNIA
HIGHWAY PATROL OFFICER
CRELOSE; CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY
PATROL OFFICER MCCONNELL; and
Does 1 to 10, inclusive,

21
Defendants.
22
THE PARTIES, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to

23
24

and respectfully ask that the Court continue the date to file a response to the First Amended

25

Complaint for Damages currently due October 20, 2016, as follows:

26



On September 23, 2016, the Court issued an order in this action concerning Defendants’

27

Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 10), and granting Plaintiff 14 days from said date to file a First

28

Amended Complaint.
1
Stipulation & Order Continuing Date to File Response to FAC (1:16-cv-00787-DAD-SKO)

1



2
3

On October 6, 2016, Plaintiff filed his First Amended Complaint for Damages (Doc. 19),
a response to which is currently due on or by October 20, 2016.



On October 4, 2016, the Supervising Deputy Attorney General assigned to this case, Peter

4

Meshot, commenced a jury trial in this very Court in Courtroom 7, before the Honorable

5

Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto (Zone Sports Center, LLC v. Ben Rodriguez, et al.,

6

Case No. 1:11-cv-00622), which trial is expected to last until October 17 or 18, 2016, and

7

maybe longer depending on the length of jury deliberations.

8



9

On October 11, 2016, Deputy Attorney General Neli Palma, also counsel for Defendants,
is scheduled to commence trial in Sacramento Superior Court (Dale Burns, v. Adam

10

Frazier, et a.l, Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2012-00135263), which trial is

11

expected to last for two weeks.

12



For each of the foregoing reasons, the parties request that the Court grant Defendants a

13

two-week extension of time for filing a response to the First Amended Complaint for

14

Damages so that it is due on or by November 3, 2016.

15

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

16

Dated: October __, 2016
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

17
18

By _/s/ Neli N. Palma_________________
NELI N. PALMA
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants

19
20
21

Dated: October __, 2016
CHAIN, COHN, STILES

22
23

By _/s/ Neil K. Gehlawat_______________
NEIL K. GEHLAWAT
Attorneys for Plaintiff

24
25
26
27
28
2

Stipulation & Order Continuing Date to File Response to FAC (1:16-cv-00787-DAD-SKO)

1

ORDER

2

Based on the parties’ above-stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants are

3

granted a two-week extension of time for filing a response to the First Amended Complaint for

4

Damages (Doc. 19). Defendants shall file a response to the First Amended Complaint for

5

Damages on or by November 3, 2016.

6
7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

October 16, 2016

/s/

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

.