Palmer v. Iosefa et al

Filing 51

ORDER on JOINT STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF CERTAIN SCHEDULED DATES. Fact Discovery Cutoff: 11/29/2017. Expert Disclosures: 12/11/2017. Supplemental Expert Disclosures: 12/29/2017. Expert Discovery Cutoff: 1/26/2018. Non-Dispositive Motion Filing: 1/26/2018. Non-Dispositive Motion Hearing: 2/28/2018. Dispositive Motion Filing: 2/21/2018. Dispositive Motion Hearing: 4/4/2018. Settlement Conference set for 4/12/2018, at 01:00 PM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. Pretrial Conference set for 5/30/2018, at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Jury Trial set for 7/31/2018, at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/2/2017. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
1 CHAIN | COHN | STILES David K. Cohn (SBN 68768) 2 Email: dcohn@chainlaw.com Neil K. Gehlawat (SBN 289388) 3 Email: ngehlawat@chainlaw.com 4 1731 Chester Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 5 Telephone: (661) 323-4000 Facsimile: (661) 324-1352 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California PETER A. MESHOT, State Bar No. 117061 Supervising Deputy Attorney General NELI N. PALMA, State Bar No. 203374 Deputy Attorney General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Telephone: (916) 445-2482 Fax: (916) 322-8288 E-mail: Neli.Palma@doj.ca.gov 15 Attorneys for Defendants California Highway Patrol Officer Iosefa, California Highway Patrol Officer Crewse 16 (erroneously sued herein as “Crelose”), and California Highway Patrol Officer McConnell 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 20 ROBERT PALMER, CASE NO. 1:16-CV-00787-SKO 21 Plaintiff, 22 23 v. 24 CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL OFFICER IOSEFA; CALIFORNIA 25 HIGHWAY PATROL OFFICER CRELOSE; CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY 26 PATROL OFFICER MCCONNELL; and 27 Does 1 to 10, inclusive, 28 ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF CERTAIN SCHEDULED DATES (Doc. 50) Defendants. -1ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF CERTAIN SCHEDULED DATES 1 ORDER Before the Court is a stipulation among the parties (Doc. 50). Having reviewed the parties’ 2 3 stipulation, and good cause appearing, the Court adopts the stipulation in part and modifies the 4 Scheduling Order (Doc. 37) as follows: 5 Current Date New Date 6 Fact Discovery Cutoff 10/2/17 11/29/17 7 Expert Disclosures 10/10/17 12/11/17 8 Suppl. Expert Disclosures 10/20/17 12/29/17 9 Expert Discovery Cutoff 11/10/17 1/26/18 11/10/17 1/26/18 11 Non-Dispositive Mtn. Hearing 12/13/17 2/28/18 12 Dispositive Mtn. Filing 12/6/17 2/21/18 13 Dispositive Mtn. Hearing 1/24/18 4/4/181 14 Settlement Conference 2/16/18 4/12/18 at 1:00 p.m. in Courtroom 10 before United States Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean2 16 Pre-Trial Conference 3/14/18 5/30/18 17 Trial 5/8/18 7/31/183 10 Non-Dispositive Mtn. Filing 15 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 Dated: 21 October 2, 2017 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 1 The parties proposed March 28, 2018, as the hearing date for dispositive motions. To allow the Court adequate time to 25 rule on dispositive motions in advance of the pretrial conference, the proposed hearing date has been continued. 26 27 28 2 Due to the impending retirement of United States Magistrate Judge Seng, before whom the parties’ settlement conference was previously set, the settlement conference has been re-set before United States Magistrate Judge Grosjean, in accordance with her calendar. 3 To permit the parties sufficient time to prepare their pretrial submissions and to prepare for trial, the pretrial conference and trial dates have been continued from the parties’ proposed dates of May 23, 2018, and July 23, 2018, respectively. -2ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF CERTAIN SCHEDULED DATES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?