Palmer v. Iosefa et al

Filing 54

ORDER on JOINT STIPULATION for CONTINUANCE of CERTAIN SCHEDULED DATES. Fact Discovery Cut-off: 1/31/18. Expert Disclosures: 2/16/18. Suppl. Expert Disclosures: 3/2/18. Expert Discovery Cut-off: 4/16/18. Non-Dispositive Mtn. Filing: 4/25/18. Non-Dispositive Mtn. Hearing: 5/23/18. Dispositive Mtn. Filing: 5/9/18. Dispositive Mtn. Hearing: 6/20/18. Settlement Conference currently set for 4/12/2018, is CONTINUED to 8/3/2018, at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Jud ge Erica P. Grosjean. Pretrial Conference currently set for 5/30/2018, is CONTINUED to 8/29/2018, at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Jury Trial currently set for 7/31/2018, is CONTINUED to 10/30/2018, at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/19/2017. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRESNO DIVISION 11 12 ROBERT PALMER, 1:16-cv-00787 SKO 13 Plaintiff, ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF CERTAIN SCHEDULED DATES 14 v. 15 16 CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL OFFICER IOSEFA; et al., 17 Defendants. 18 19 Pursuant to the Court’s order entered October 2, 2017, fact discovery was to be completed 20 by November 29, 2017, and experts were to be disclosed by December 11, 2017. (See Doc. 51.) 21 The parties filed their “Joint Stipulation for Continuance of Certain Dates” (the “Stipulation”) on 22 December 13, 2017—after these deadlines had passed. (See Doc. 53.) 23 Although the Court may extend time for discovery after the deadline has expired because 24 of “excusable neglect,” Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(B), no such excusable neglect has been 25 articulated—much less shown—here. Notwithstanding this deficiency, and given the absence of 26 bad faith or prejudice to Plaintiff (as evidenced by the parties’ agreement to the extension of 27 time), and in view of the liberal construction of Fed. R. Civ. 6(b)(1) to effectuate the general 28 1 Order on Joint Stipulation for Continuance of Certain Scheduled Dates (1:16-cv-00787-SKO) 1 purpose of seeing that cases are tried on the merits, see Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures, Inc., 624 2 F.3d 1253, 1258–59 (9th Cir. 2010), the Court will adopt the Stipulation in part, with 3 modifications indicated below. The parties are cautioned that future post hoc request for 4 extensions of time will be viewed with disfavor. 5 In addition, the Court notes that some of the deadlines represented as “current” in the 6 Stipulation are not the same as those deadlines set by the Court in its October 2, 2017, order. 7 (Compare Doc. 53 with Doc. 51.) The Court admonishes the parties to carefully review all 8 prior orders of the Court before seeking further judicial action. 9 10 Having reviewed the Stipulation, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS the Stipulation IN PART, and modifies its October 2, 2017, order as follows: 11 Current Date New Date 12 Fact Discovery Cut-off 11/29/17 1/31/18 13 Expert Disclosures 12/11/17 2/16/18 14 Suppl. Expert Disclosures 12/29/17 3/2/18 15 Expert Discovery Cut-off 1/26/18 4/16/18 16 Non-Dispositive Mtn. Filing 1/26/18 4/25/18 17 Non-Dispositive Mtn. Hearing 2/28/18 5/23/18 18 Dispositive Mtn. Filing 2/21/18 5/9/18 19 Dispositive Mtn. Hearing 4/4/18 6/20/18 20 Settlement Conference 4/12/18 8/3/18 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 10 before U.S. Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean 23 Pre-Trial Conference 5/30/18 8/29/18 24 Trial 7/31/18 10/30/18 21 22 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 Dated: December 19, 2017 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 2 Order on Joint Stipulation for Continuance of Certain Scheduled Dates (1:16-cv-00787-SKO)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?