Marcos Maria Godinez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 15

Stipulation and Order to extend time, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 1/26/2017. (Opening Brief Deadline: 3/4/2017) (Rosales, O)

Download PDF
1 4 ROCKWELL, KELLY, DUARTE & URSTOEGER, LLP By: Sharon E. Kelly State Bar No 187936 P.O. Box 0142 Modesto, CA 95353 Phone (209) 521-2552 Fax: (209) 526-7898 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 2 3 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 ) ) Case No.: 1:16-cv-00789-EPG ) Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION AND ORDER ) TO EXTEND TIME vs. ) ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ) ) Defendant ) MARCOS MARIA GODINEZ, 16 17 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, subject to the approval of the 18 Court, to extend the time by 30 days, to March 4, 2017, for plaintiff to serve plaintiff’s letter 19 brief. The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified 20 21 accordingly 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// -1- 1 Plaintiff’s attorney is attending a California Applicants’ Attorney Association convention 2 from January 25 through January 29, 2017 and has a heavy trial workload after returning to the 3 office. Plaintiff’s attorney requests additional time to review the file and prepare the letter brief. 4 5 Respectfully submitted, Dated: January 25, 2017 By: /s/ Sharon E. Kelly Sharon E. Kelly Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: January 25, 2017 Phillip A. Talbert United States Attorney 6 7 8 9 10 By: /s/ Donna Wade Anderson (As authorized via email) Donna Wade Anderson Attorney for Defendant 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 -2- 1 ORDER 2 For the reasons stated in the stipulation, the Court finds good cause to extend the date for 3 Plaintiff to serve the opening brief to March 4, 2017. The Court’s Scheduling Order is modified 4 accordingly. 5 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 26, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?