Marcos Maria Godinez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
15
Stipulation and Order to extend time, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 1/26/2017. (Opening Brief Deadline: 3/4/2017) (Rosales, O)
1
4
ROCKWELL, KELLY, DUARTE & URSTOEGER, LLP
By: Sharon E. Kelly
State Bar No 187936
P.O. Box 0142
Modesto, CA 95353
Phone (209) 521-2552
Fax: (209) 526-7898
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff
2
3
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
)
) Case No.: 1:16-cv-00789-EPG
)
Plaintiff,
) STIPULATION AND ORDER
) TO EXTEND TIME
vs.
)
)
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, )
)
Defendant
)
MARCOS MARIA GODINEZ,
16
17
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, subject to the approval of the
18
Court, to extend the time by 30 days, to March 4, 2017, for plaintiff to serve plaintiff’s letter
19
brief.
The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified
20
21
accordingly
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
-1-
1
Plaintiff’s attorney is attending a California Applicants’ Attorney Association convention
2
from January 25 through January 29, 2017 and has a heavy trial workload after returning to the
3
office. Plaintiff’s attorney requests additional time to review the file and prepare the letter brief.
4
5
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: January 25, 2017
By: /s/ Sharon E. Kelly
Sharon E. Kelly
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: January 25, 2017
Phillip A. Talbert
United States Attorney
6
7
8
9
10
By: /s/ Donna Wade Anderson
(As authorized via email)
Donna Wade Anderson
Attorney for Defendant
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
-2-
1
ORDER
2
For the reasons stated in the stipulation, the Court finds good cause to extend the date for
3
Plaintiff to serve the opening brief to March 4, 2017. The Court’s Scheduling Order is modified
4
accordingly.
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 26, 2017
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?