Young v. Sun Life and Health Insurance Company
ORDER DENYING 23 Request to Amend the Case Schedule Without Prejudice, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/30/2017. (Hall, S)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SUN LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO
AMEND THE CASE SCHEDULE
Case No. 1:16-cv-00822-LJO-JLT
Counsel have stipulated to amend the case schedule based upon the defendant’s expressed
intent to file a motion for protective order to prevent the depositions of two employees of the
defendant and a treating physician. (Doc. 23 at 2) However, because the defendant has not
complied with the requirements of the scheduling order (Doc. 21 at 2-3), which is the precursor to
filing a motion to compel, any consideration of amending the case schedule is not ripe. Thus, the
The stipulation to amend the case schedule (Doc. 23) is DENIED WITHOUT
IT IS SO ORDERED.
March 30, 2017
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?