Young v. Sun Life and Health Insurance Company

Filing 25

ORDER DENYING 23 Request to Amend the Case Schedule Without Prejudice, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/30/2017. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VICKI YOUNG, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, vs. SUN LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY, ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO AMEND THE CASE SCHEDULE WITHOUT PREJUDICE (Doc. 23) Defendants. 16 17 Case No. 1:16-cv-00822-LJO-JLT Counsel have stipulated to amend the case schedule based upon the defendant’s expressed 18 intent to file a motion for protective order to prevent the depositions of two employees of the 19 defendant and a treating physician. (Doc. 23 at 2) However, because the defendant has not 20 complied with the requirements of the scheduling order (Doc. 21 at 2-3), which is the precursor to 21 filing a motion to compel, any consideration of amending the case schedule is not ripe. Thus, the 22 Court ORDERS: 23 1. 24 The stipulation to amend the case schedule (Doc. 23) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 30, 2017 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?