Young v. Sun Life and Health Insurance Company
Filing
35
ORDER GRANTING 34 Stipulation to Continue Trial Briefing Schedule, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/27/2017. Opening trial briefs due by 9/19/2017; responding trial briefs due by 10/17/2017. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Glenn R. Kantor – State Bar No. 122643
E-mail: gkantor@kantorlaw.net
Andrew M. Kantor – State Bar No. 303093
E-mail: akantor@kantorlaw.net
KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP
19839 Nordhoff Street
Northridge, California, 91324
Telephone: (818) 886-2525
Facsimile: (818) 350-6272
Attorneys for Plaintiffs,
VICKI YOUNG
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
VICKI YOUNG,
KANTOR & KANTOR LLP
19839 Nordhoff Street
Northridge, California 91324
(818) 886 2525
12
13
14
15
Case No. 1:16-cv-00822-LJO-JLT
Plaintiffs,
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
(Doc. 34)
v.
SUN LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The parties hereto, Plaintiff Vicky Young (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant Sun Life and Health
Insurance Company (“Sun Life”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby
stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, pursuant to this Court’s Further Scheduling Order (Dkt. #21), Opening
Briefs are presently due August 1, 2017; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Judge Thurston’s signed Order granting the parties Stipulation
to Amend Scheduling Order Regarding Trial Briefs (Dkt. 30), the Responding Briefs are now
due September 5, 2017; and
WHEREAS, the parties have still not resolved all discovery disputes, despite the
assistance of Magistrate Thurston; and
1
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE
1
2
3
4
5
WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel was under the mistaken impression that trial briefing had
been postponed as a result of the aforementioned discovery disputes; and
WHEREAS, the parties are desirous of continuing the trial briefing schedule for a period
of forty-nine (49) days and defendant has no objection to the request;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties stipulate to and request the Court to continue the deadline
6
for the parties to file their opening trial briefs to September 19, 2017, and to continue the deadline to
7
file responding briefs to October 17, 2017, with a new trial date of November 14, 2017 or a date
8
convenient to the court’s calendar.
9
10
DATED: July 27, 2017
KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP
11
KANTOR & KANTOR LLP
19839 Nordhoff Street
Northridge, California 91324
(818) 886 2525
12
By
/s/ Andrew M. Kantor
Andrew M. Kantor
Attorneys for Plaintiff
VICKI YOUNG
13
14
15
DATED: July 27, 2017
HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP
16
17
By:
/s/ Adam B. Rucker
Adam B. Rucker
Attorneys for Defendant
Sun Life Health and Insurance Company
(U.S.), erroneously sued as Sun Life and
Health Insurance Company
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Filer’s Attestation
The filing attorney attests that he has obtained concurrence regarding the filing of this
document and its content from the signatories to this document.
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE
1
ORDER
2
Based on the parties’ Stipulation and good cause appearing, the deadline for the parties to
3
file their opening trial briefs shall be continued to September 19, 2017, and the deadline to file
4
responding trial briefs will be continued to October 17, 2017.
5
responding brief deadline, if it appears from the papers that a hearing/bench trial would be helpful
6
or necessary, the Court will set one at a date convenient for the Court's calendar. Alternatively, the
7
parties may explicitly waive the right to a hearing/bench trial in their briefs.
8
Upon the expiration of the
The Court contemplates absolutely no further amendments to the briefing schedule.
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
July 27, 2017
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
KANTOR & KANTOR LLP
19839 Nordhoff Street
Northridge, California 91324
(818) 886 2525
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?