Young v. Sun Life and Health Insurance Company

Filing 35

ORDER GRANTING 34 Stipulation to Continue Trial Briefing Schedule, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/27/2017. Opening trial briefs due by 9/19/2017; responding trial briefs due by 10/17/2017. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Glenn R. Kantor – State Bar No. 122643 E-mail: gkantor@kantorlaw.net Andrew M. Kantor – State Bar No. 303093 E-mail: akantor@kantorlaw.net KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP 19839 Nordhoff Street Northridge, California, 91324 Telephone: (818) 886-2525 Facsimile: (818) 350-6272 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, VICKI YOUNG 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VICKI YOUNG, KANTOR & KANTOR LLP 19839 Nordhoff Street Northridge, California 91324 (818) 886 2525 12 13 14 15 Case No. 1:16-cv-00822-LJO-JLT Plaintiffs, STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE (Doc. 34) v. SUN LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The parties hereto, Plaintiff Vicky Young (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant Sun Life and Health Insurance Company (“Sun Life”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, pursuant to this Court’s Further Scheduling Order (Dkt. #21), Opening Briefs are presently due August 1, 2017; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Judge Thurston’s signed Order granting the parties Stipulation to Amend Scheduling Order Regarding Trial Briefs (Dkt. 30), the Responding Briefs are now due September 5, 2017; and WHEREAS, the parties have still not resolved all discovery disputes, despite the assistance of Magistrate Thurston; and 1 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE 1 2 3 4 5 WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel was under the mistaken impression that trial briefing had been postponed as a result of the aforementioned discovery disputes; and WHEREAS, the parties are desirous of continuing the trial briefing schedule for a period of forty-nine (49) days and defendant has no objection to the request; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties stipulate to and request the Court to continue the deadline 6 for the parties to file their opening trial briefs to September 19, 2017, and to continue the deadline to 7 file responding briefs to October 17, 2017, with a new trial date of November 14, 2017 or a date 8 convenient to the court’s calendar. 9 10 DATED: July 27, 2017 KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP 11 KANTOR & KANTOR LLP 19839 Nordhoff Street Northridge, California 91324 (818) 886 2525 12 By /s/ Andrew M. Kantor Andrew M. Kantor Attorneys for Plaintiff VICKI YOUNG 13 14 15 DATED: July 27, 2017 HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP 16 17 By: /s/ Adam B. Rucker Adam B. Rucker Attorneys for Defendant Sun Life Health and Insurance Company (U.S.), erroneously sued as Sun Life and Health Insurance Company 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Filer’s Attestation The filing attorney attests that he has obtained concurrence regarding the filing of this document and its content from the signatories to this document. 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE 1 ORDER 2 Based on the parties’ Stipulation and good cause appearing, the deadline for the parties to 3 file their opening trial briefs shall be continued to September 19, 2017, and the deadline to file 4 responding trial briefs will be continued to October 17, 2017. 5 responding brief deadline, if it appears from the papers that a hearing/bench trial would be helpful 6 or necessary, the Court will set one at a date convenient for the Court's calendar. Alternatively, the 7 parties may explicitly waive the right to a hearing/bench trial in their briefs. 8 Upon the expiration of the The Court contemplates absolutely no further amendments to the briefing schedule. 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 27, 2017 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE KANTOR & KANTOR LLP 19839 Nordhoff Street Northridge, California 91324 (818) 886 2525 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?