Autosoft, Inc. v. Autosoft Net, Inc.

Filing 27

ORDER Directing the Clerk of the Cour to Close the Case signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 03/03/2017. CASE CLOSED.(Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

AUTOSOFT, INC., a Pennsylvania
Corporation,
Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant,

13
14
vs.

17
18

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE
COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE
(Doc. No. 24)

15
16

No. 1:16-cv-00826-LJO-SKO

AUTOSOFT NET, INC., a California
Corporation,
Defendant and Counterclaim
Plaintiff.

19
20

On February 24, 2017, the parties filed a “Rule 41 Dismissal of Complaint of Autosoft,

21

Inc. and Dismissal of Counterclaims of Autosoft Net.” (Doc. No. 24.) In light of the parties’

22

stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of

23

San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice.

24

Furthermore, the Court entered an “Order Sealing Document Pursuant to Local Rule 141,”

25

sealing the 9-page Confidential Settlement Agreement entered into between the parties on

26

February 8, 2016. (Doc. 23.) Such sealing order SHALL REMAIN IN EFFECT until February

27

23, 2022, and this Court SHALL RETAIN JURISDICTION to enforce the Confidential

28

1

Settlement Agreement until that date.

2

Finally, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case.

3
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

March 3, 2017

/s/

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

.