Becker v. Sherman, et al.
Filing
22
ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL re 18 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/7/17. Attorney David Ikenna Adams, Ashley Bauer and Christopher J. Bower Added for Joseph Becker. Amended Complaint Due Within Thirty Days. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
JOSEPH BECKER,
11
12
CASE No. 1:16-cv-0828-MJS (PC)
Plaintiff,
ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL
v.
13
WARDEN SHERMAN, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
Plaintiff is a transgender state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
17
in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 10, 2017, plaintiff filed
18
a motion to appoint counsel. (ECF No. 18.) The court finds that the appointment of
19
counsel is warranted and will grant Plaintiff’s motion. David I. Adams, Ashley M. Bauer,
20
and Christopher J. Bower have been selected from the court’s pro bono attorney panel
21
to represent Plaintiff and have agreed to be appointed.
22
23
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel (ECF No. 18) is granted. David I. Adams,
24
Ashley M. Bauer, and Christopher J. Bower are appointed as counsel in the
25
above entitled matter.
26
27
28
2. Appointed counsel shall notify Sujean Park at (916) 930-4278, or via email at
spark@caed.uscourts.gov if they have any questions related to the appointment.
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on David I. Adams,
1
1
2
Ashley M. Bauer, and Christopher J. Bower, Latham & Watkins, 505 Montgomery
3
St., Suite 2000, San Francisco, CA 94111.
4
5
4. Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time (ECF No. 21) is also granted. A first
amended complaint shall be filed within thirty days from the date of this order.
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
March 7, 2017
/s/
9
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?