Becker v. Sherman, et al.

Filing 86

ORDER LIFTING STAY signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 6/6/2018. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 JOSEPH BECKER, Case No. 1:16-cv-00828-AWI-JDP Plaintiff, v. 13 14 MAXIMO LUNES, et al., 15 ORDER LIFTING STAY Defendant. 16 17 Pro se plaintiff Joseph Becker, also known as Cinnamon Becker, is proceeding in this civil 18 rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case is proceeding on plaintiff’s second amended 19 complaint against L. Cartagena, K. Loyd, Maximo Lunes, Joel Martinez, C. Moreno, N. Peterson, 20 M. Ross, J. Wetenkamp, and Does 1-10 for failure to protect in violation of the Eighth 21 Amendment. (Doc. No. 66.) 22 The parties previously stipulated to extensions of time to file a joint proposed discovery 23 schedule, and the case has been stayed while the parties participated in a settlement conference. 24 On May 31, 2018, the parties filed a joint status report indicating that the case did not settle and 25 asking the court to lift the stay so that this matter may proceed to discovery. (Doc. No. 85.) 26 Accordingly, 27 1. The stay entered on April 2, 2018 is LIFTED. 28 2. Within fourteen days, the parties shall file a joint proposed schedule for further 1 1 litigation of this matter. The proposed schedule also shall be e-mailed, in Word 2 format, to jdporders@caed.uscourts.gov. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 6, 2018 /s/ 6 Jeremy D. Peterson UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?