Peo v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 21

ORDER RE SECOND STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S OPENING BRIEF. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Plaintiffs opening brief shall be filed on or before May 29, 2017; Defendants responsive pleading shall be filed on or before June 2 8, 2017; Plaintiffs reply, if any, shall be filed on or before July 12, 2017; and The parties are advised that due to the impact of social security cases on the Courts docket and the Courts desire to have cases decided in an expedient manner, request s for modification of the briefing scheduling will not routinely be granted and will only be granted upon a showing of good cause. Further, requests to modify the briefing schedule that are made on the eve of a deadline will be looked upon with disfavor and may be denied absent good cause for the delay in seeking an extension. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/1/2017. (Hernandez, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

KOUM PEO,

)
)
Plaintiff
)
)
v.
)
)
COMMISSIONERR OF SOCIAL
)
SECURITY,
)
)
Defendant
)
)
____________________________________)

Case No. 1:16-cv-00834-LJO-SAB
ORDER RE SECOND STIPULATION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
PLAINTIFF'S OPENING BRIEF
(ECF No. 20)

On May 1, 2017, the parties filed a second stipulation to extend time for Plaintiff to file her
opening brief.

19

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
20

1.

Plaintiff’s opening brief shall be filed on or before May 29, 2017;

22

2.

Defendant’s responsive pleading shall be filed on or before June 28, 2017;

23

3.

Plaintiff’s reply, if any, shall be filed on or before July 12, 2017; and

4.

The parties are advised that due to the impact of social security cases on the Court’s

21

24
25

docket and the Court’s desire to have cases decided in an expedient manner, requests

26
27
28

for modification of the briefing scheduling will not routinely be granted and will only
be granted upon a showing of good cause. Further, requests to modify the briefing

1

schedule that are made on the eve of a deadline will be looked upon with disfavor and

2

may be denied absent good cause for the delay in seeking an extension.

3
4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

May 1, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order be modified

1
2

accordingly.

3
4

Respectfully submitted,

5
6
7

Date: May 1, 2017

8
9

JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND
Attorney at Law

10

/s/Jacqueline A. Forslund
JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND

11

Attorney for Plaintiff

12
13

Date: May 1, 2017
14
15
16
17

PHILIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration

19

/s/Richard M. Rodriguez
RICHARD M. RODRIGUEZ
Special Assistant United States Attorney
*By email authorization

20

Attorney for Defendant

18

21

ORDER

22
23

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED

24
25
26
27
28

DATED: ____________________

____________________________
STANLEY A. BOONE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE