Washington v. Apria Healthcare Group, Inc.
Filing
12
THIRD STIPULATION and ORDER to EXTEND Time to Respond to Initial Complaint. Defendant shall file its responsive pleading by no later than September 30, 2016. The Scheduling Conference currently set for September 29, 2016, in this mat ter is CONTINUED to November 29, 2016, at 10:15 a.m. in Courtroom 7 before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The parties shall file their joint scheduling report by no later than November 22, 2016. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/31/2016. (Timken, A)
1
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
2 865 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2400
Los Angeles, CA 90017-2566
3 Telephone: (213) 633-6800
4 Fax: (213) 633-6899
5
Rochelle L. Wilcox (SBN 197790)
6 rochellewilcox@dwt.com
7
Attorney for Defendant
Apria Healthcare Group, Inc.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
MACARTHUR WASHINGTON, on
) Case No. 1:16-cv-00847-DAD-SKO
behalf of himself and all others similarly )
situated,
) THIRD STIPULATION AND ORDER
) TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND
Plaintiff,
) TO INITIAL COMPLAINT (L.R. 144)
)
vs.
)
)
APRIA HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC., )
and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and )
each of them
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
20
21
This Stipulation is entered by and between Plaintiff MacArthur Washington
22
(“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Apria Healthcare, Inc. (“Apria”) through their respective
23
counsel of record, with reference to the following facts:
24
1.
Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this action on June 17, 2016.
25
2.
Apria was served with the Complaint on June 29, 2016, making Apria’s
26
response to the Complaint originally due July 20, 2016.
27
28
1
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
DWT 30243428v1 0025959-000042
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
865 S. FIGUEROA ST, SUITE 2400
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017-2566
(213) 633-6800
Fax: (213) 633-6899
1
3.
Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), Plaintiff agreed to extend the time for
2
Apria to respond to the Complaint by 21 days, up to and including August 10, 2016.
3
The parties filed a stipulation to that effect on July 19, 2016 (Doc. 7).
4
4.
Since that time, the parties investigated the facts and circumstances
5
alleged in the Complaint and voluntarily exchanged information and documents
6
relating to those allegations. To further facilitate that investigation, on August 10,
7
2016, the parties filed a stipulation to extend the deadline for Apria to respond to the
8
Complaint by an additional 21 days, up to and including August 31, 2016 (Doc. 9).
9
On August 11, 2016, the Court entered an order extending the deadline accordingly
10
11
(Doc. 10).
5.
Over the past week, the parties have begun exploring the possibility of
12
settling their dispute. If the parties voluntarily resolve this case, it will avoid
13
unnecessary waste of the parties’ (and the Court’s) time and resources. The parties
14
anticipate they will conclude these early settlement discussions one way or another
15
within the next three weeks.
16
6.
To facilitate these settlement discussions, the parties stipulate and jointly
17
ask the Court to extend the time for Apria to respond to the Complaint by another 30
18
days, up to and including September 30, 2016.
19
7.
The parties further ask the Court to reset the Mandatory Scheduling
20
Conference from September 29, 2016, to a date and time approximately thirty (30)
21
days later. The parties respectfully submit that their early settlement discussions—
22
and the prospect of conserving limited judicial resources in the event this matter is
23
resolved in the near future—constitutes “good cause” sufficient to warrant a brief,
24
30-day continuance of the Scheduling Conference and the Court’s entry of a
25
scheduling order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(2).
26
27
8.
All signatories listed below, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted,
concur in this filing’s content and have authorized this filing.
28
2
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
DWT 30243428v1 0025959-000042
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
865 S. FIGUEROA ST, SUITE 2400
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017-2566
(213) 633-6800
Fax: (213) 633-6899
1
9.
This is the second request to the Court for an extension of time; as noted
2
above, the parties initially stipulated to a 21-day extension of time pursuant to Local
3
Rule 144(a), which did not require Court approval.
4
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that,
5
subject to the approval of the Court, Defendant shall have an extension of time up to
6
and including September 30, 2016, to respond to the Complaint in this action, and the
7
Court’s Mandatory Scheduling Conference shall be continued from September 29,
8
2016 to a date and time to be determined by the Court.
9
10
DATED: August 31, 2016
11
12
13
LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN, P.C.
TODD M. FRIEDMAN
MEGHAN E. GEORGE
ADRIAN BACON
By: s/ Adrian Bacon *
Adrian Bacon
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MACARTHUR WASHINGTON
14
15
16
* (as authorized by email on 8/30/16)
17
18
19
DATED: August 31, 2016
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
ROCHELLE L. WILCOX
20
21
By: s/ Rochelle L. Wilcox
Rochelle L. Wilcox
Attorney for Defendant
APRIA HEALTHCARE, INC.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
DWT 30243428v1 0025959-000042
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
865 S. FIGUEROA ST, SUITE 2400
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017-2566
(213) 633-6800
Fax: (213) 633-6899
1
ORDER
2
3
4
Pursuant to the above-stipulation, it is hereby ORDERED that:
5
1.
6
30, 2016; and
7
2.
Defendant shall file its responsive pleading by no later than September
The Scheduling Conference currently set for September 29, 2016 in this
8
matter is CONTINUED to November 29, 2016 at 10:15 a.m. in Courtroom 7
9
before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto.
10
The parties shall file their joint
scheduling report by no later than November 22, 2016.
11
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
August 31, 2016
/s/
Sheila K. Oberto
.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
DWT 30243428v1 0025959-000042
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
865 S. FIGUEROA ST, SUITE 2400
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017-2566
(213) 633-6800
Fax: (213) 633-6899
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?