Abrantes v. Fitness Evolution, LLC

Filing 36

STIPULATION and ORDER EXTENDING Time to Respond to Second Amended Complaint. Defendant, FITNESS 19 CA 228, LLC's deadline to respond to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint is extended from June 27, 2017, to July 18, 2017. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/23/2017. (Timken, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6

`
KEITH M. WHITE #188536
COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP
Attorneys at Law
499 West Shaw, Suite 116
Fresno, California 93704
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant,
FITNESS 19 CA 228, LLC (erroneously sued herein as
Fitness 19 LLC)

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

JOGERT ABRANTES and JOANNE GOSS, Case No. 1:16-cv-00903-LJO-SKO
on behalf of themselves and all others
similarly situated,

14
15
16
17

STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs,

13
v.

(Doc. 33)

FITNESS 19 LLC; SOCALEVOLUTION,
LLC; FITNESS EVOLUTION
FRANCHISING LLC; PLEASANTON
FITNESS; and DOES 1 THROUGH 10,
inclusive and each of them,

18

Defendants.

19
20

Defendant, FITNESS 19 CA 228, LLC (erroneously sued herein as Fitness 19 LLC)

21

(“Defendant”) and Plaintiffs, JOGERT ABRANTES and JOANNE GOSS (“Plaintiffs”),

22

hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

23

WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1)(b), Defendant

24

currently has until June 27, 2017 to answer or respond to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended

25

Complaint.

26
27

WHEREAS, Defendant was granted a 28 day extension previously making this
Defendant’s second extension to answer or respond to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint.

28
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have agreed to stipulate, subject to the Court’s approval, to

2

extend the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint until

3

July 18, 2017.

4

THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and subject to the Court’s

5

approval, Plaintiffs and Defendant stipulate to the extension of time for Defendant to respond

6

to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint from June 27, 2017 to July 18, 2017.

7
8

Dated: June 23, 2017

LAW OFFICES OF TODD FRIEDMAN, P.C.

9
10
By: /s/ Todd M. Friedman
TODD M. FRIEDMAN
Attorneys for Plaintiffs, JOGERT
ABRANTES and JOANNE GOSS

11
12
13
14

Dated: June 23, 2017

COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP

15
16

By:

17
18

/s/ Keith M. White
KEITH M. WHITE
Attorneys for Defendant, FITNESS 19 CA
228, LLC (erroneously sued herein as
Fitness 19 LLC)

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1

ORDER

2

Pursuant to the parties above-stipulation (Doc. 34), and for good cause shown, IT IS

3

HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant, FITNESS 19 CA 228, LLC’s deadline to respond to

4

Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint is extended from June 27, 2017, to July 18, 2017.

5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 23, 2017

/s/

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

.