Abrantes v. Fitness Evolution, LLC
Filing
56
ORDER re Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to Third Amended Complaint (Doc. 53 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/20/2017. Pursuant to the parties' (Doc. 53 ), and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant, FITNESS 19 CA 228, LLC's deadline to respond to Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint is extended from October 19, 2017, to October 26, 2017. (Valdez, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
KEITH M. WHITE #188536
COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP
Attorneys at Law
499 West Shaw, Suite 116
Fresno, California 93704
Telephone: (559) 248-4820
Facsimile: (559) 248-4830
Attorneys for Defendant,
FITNESS 19 CA 228, LLC (erroneously sued herein as
Fitness 19 LLC)
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
JOGERT ABRANTES and JOANNE GOSS, Case No. 1:16-cv-00903-LJO-SKO
on behalf of themselves and all others
similarly situated,
14
15
16
17
STIPULATION
AND
ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO
THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
Plaintiffs,
13
v.
(Doc. 53)
FITNESS 19 LLC; SOCALEVOLUTION,
LLC; FITNESS EVOLUTION
FRANCHISING LLC; PLEASANTON
FITNESS; and DOES 1 THROUGH 10,
inclusive and each of them,
18
Trial Date:
None Set
Defendants.
19
20
Defendant, FITNESS 19 CA 228, LLC erroneously sued herein as Fitness 19 LLC
21
(“Defendant”) and Plaintiffs, JOGERT ABRANTES and JOANNE GOSS (“Plaintiffs”),
22
hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
23
WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1)(b), Defendant
24
currently has until October 19, 2017 to answer or respond to Plaintiffs’ Third Amended
25
Complaint.
26
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have agreed to stipulate, subject to the Court’s approval, to
27
extend the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint until
28
October 26, 2017.
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
1
THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and subject to the Court’s
2
approval, Plaintiffs and Defendant stipulate to the extension of time for Defendant to respond
3
to Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint from October 19, 2017 to October 26, 2017.
4
5
Dated: October 19, 2017
LAW OFFICES OF TODD FRIEDMAN, P.C.
6
7
By: /s/ Todd M. Friedman
TODD M. FRIEDMAN
Attorneys for Plaintiffs, JOGERT
ABRANTES and JOANNE GOSS
8
9
10
11
Dated: October 19, 2017
COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP
12
13
By:
14
15
/s/ Keith M. White
KEITH M. WHITE
Attorneys for Defendant, FITNESS 19 CA
228, LLC (erroneously sued herein as
Fitness 19 LLC)
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
1
ORDER
2
Pursuant to the parties’ (Doc. 53), and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that
3
Defendant, FITNESS 19 CA 228, LLC’s deadline to respond to Plaintiffs’ Third Amended
4
Complaint is extended from October 19, 2017, to October 26, 2017.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated:
October 20, 2017
/s/
Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?