Abrantes v. Fitness Evolution, LLC

Filing 56

ORDER re Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to Third Amended Complaint (Doc. 53 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/20/2017. Pursuant to the parties' (Doc. 53 ), and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant, FITNESS 19 CA 228, LLC's deadline to respond to Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint is extended from October 19, 2017, to October 26, 2017. (Valdez, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 KEITH M. WHITE #188536 COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP Attorneys at Law 499 West Shaw, Suite 116 Fresno, California 93704 Telephone: (559) 248-4820 Facsimile: (559) 248-4830 Attorneys for Defendant, FITNESS 19 CA 228, LLC (erroneously sued herein as Fitness 19 LLC) 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 JOGERT ABRANTES and JOANNE GOSS, Case No. 1:16-cv-00903-LJO-SKO on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, 14 15 16 17 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, 13 v. (Doc. 53) FITNESS 19 LLC; SOCALEVOLUTION, LLC; FITNESS EVOLUTION FRANCHISING LLC; PLEASANTON FITNESS; and DOES 1 THROUGH 10, inclusive and each of them, 18 Trial Date: None Set Defendants. 19 20 Defendant, FITNESS 19 CA 228, LLC erroneously sued herein as Fitness 19 LLC 21 (“Defendant”) and Plaintiffs, JOGERT ABRANTES and JOANNE GOSS (“Plaintiffs”), 22 hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 23 WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1)(b), Defendant 24 currently has until October 19, 2017 to answer or respond to Plaintiffs’ Third Amended 25 Complaint. 26 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have agreed to stipulate, subject to the Court’s approval, to 27 extend the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint until 28 October 26, 2017. 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 1 THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and subject to the Court’s 2 approval, Plaintiffs and Defendant stipulate to the extension of time for Defendant to respond 3 to Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint from October 19, 2017 to October 26, 2017. 4 5 Dated: October 19, 2017 LAW OFFICES OF TODD FRIEDMAN, P.C. 6 7 By: /s/ Todd M. Friedman TODD M. FRIEDMAN Attorneys for Plaintiffs, JOGERT ABRANTES and JOANNE GOSS 8 9 10 11 Dated: October 19, 2017 COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP 12 13 By: 14 15 /s/ Keith M. White KEITH M. WHITE Attorneys for Defendant, FITNESS 19 CA 228, LLC (erroneously sued herein as Fitness 19 LLC) 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 1 ORDER 2 Pursuant to the parties’ (Doc. 53), and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that 3 Defendant, FITNESS 19 CA 228, LLC’s deadline to respond to Plaintiffs’ Third Amended 4 Complaint is extended from October 19, 2017, to October 26, 2017. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: October 20, 2017 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?