Abrantes v. Fitness Evolution, LLC

Filing 62

SECOND STIPULATION and ORDER EXTENDING Time to Respond to Third Amended Complaint. Defendant, FITNESS 19 CA 228, LLC's (erroneously sued herein as Fitness 19 LLC) deadline to respond to Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint is hereby extended from October 26, 2017, to November 2, 2017. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/30/2017. (Timken, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6

KEITH M. WHITE #188536
COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP
Attorneys at Law
499 West Shaw, Suite 116
Fresno, California 93704
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant,
FITNESS 19 CA 228, LLC (erroneously sued herein as
Fitness 19 LLC)

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

JOGERT ABRANTES and JOANNE GOSS, Case No. 1:16-cv-00903-LJO-SKO
on behalf of themselves and all others
similarly situated,

v.

14
15
16
17

SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO
THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs,

13

(Doc. 57)

FITNESS 19 LLC; SOCALEVOLUTION,
LLC; FITNESS EVOLUTION
FRANCHISING LLC; PLEASANTON
FITNESS; and DOES 1 THROUGH 10,
inclusive and each of them,

18

Trial Date:

None Set

Defendants.

19
20

Defendant, FITNESS 19 CA 228, LLC erroneously sued herein as Fitness 19 LLC

21

(“Defendant”) and Plaintiffs, JOGERT ABRANTES and JOANNE GOSS (“Plaintiffs”),

22

hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the prior stipulation and order, Defendant currently has until

23
24

October 26, 2017 to respond to Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint;

25

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have agreed to stipulate, subject to the Court’s approval, to

26

extend the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint to

27

November 2, 2017, while the parties meet and confer concerning the proper response;

28

///
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1
2
3
4

WHEREAS, this extension of time will bring the total of extensions to two (2) weeks or
14 days;
WHEREAS, the next hearing calendared in this matter is the Scheduling Conference on
November 21, 2017, and this extension will not interfere with that date;

5

THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and subject to the Court’s

6

approval, Plaintiffs and Defendant stipulate to the extension of time for Defendant to respond

7

to Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint from October 26, 2017 to November 2, 2017.

8
9

Dated: October 25, 2017

LAW OFFICES OF TODD FRIEDMAN, P.C.

10
11
By: /s/ Todd M. Friedman
TODD M. FRIEDMAN
Attorneys for Plaintiffs, JOGERT
ABRANTES and JOANNE GOSS

12
13
14
15

Dated: October 25, 2017

COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP

16
17

By:

18
19

/s/ Keith M. White
KEITH M. WHITE
Attorneys for Defendant, FITNESS 19 CA
228, LLC (erroneously sued herein as
Fitness 19 LLC)

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1

ORDER

2

Pursuant to the parties’ above stipulation, and for good cause shown, IT IS SO

3

ORDERED that Defendant, FITNESS 19 CA 228, LLC’s (erroneously sued herein as Fitness

4

19 LLC) deadline to respond to Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint is hereby extended from

5

October 26, 2017, to November 2, 2017.

6
7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

October 30, 2017

/s/

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

.