United States v. Jara, Jr. et al.
Filing
32
ORDER CLOSING CASE, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/7/17. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
v.
ELISEO JARA, JR., et. Al.,
Defendants.
15
16
17
) Case No.: 1:16-cv-00906-AWI -JLT
)
) ORDER CLOSING CASE
) (Doc. 30)
)
)
)
)
)
)
The parties have stipulated to dismiss the action with prejudice with each party bearing their
18
own costs. (Doc. 30) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41permits the plaintiff to dismiss an action
19
without a court order “by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.”
20
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Because all parties who have appeared in the action signed the
21
stipulation (Doc. 79), it “automatically terminate[d] the action.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d
22
688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action.
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
August 7, 2017
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?