Thomas v. Davey et al

Filing 23

ORDER Adopting 19 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding Plaintiff's 7 14 Motions for Emergency Preliminary Injunction and 13 Motion for Order to Show Cause signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/6/2017. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

EDWARD THOMAS,

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

Plaintiff,
v.
DAVE DAVEY, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:16-cv-00925-AWI-BAM (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR EMERGENCY
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND MOTION
FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
(ECF Nos. 7, 13, 14, 19)

Plaintiff Edward Thomas (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
pauperis, initiated this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on June 27, 2016.

21

On January 27, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that

22

Plaintiff’s motions for a preliminary injunction and his related motion for an order to show cause be

23

denied. The Findings and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff, and contained notice that any

24

objections were to be filed within fourteen (14) days after service. (ECF No. 19 at 3). More than

25

fourteen days have passed and no objections have been filed.

26

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

27

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and

28

recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

adopted in full;

3
4

2.

7

Plaintiff’s motions for a preliminary injunction, filed on July 15, 2016 (Doc. No. 7) and
October 26, 2016 (Doc. No. 14), are DENIED; and

5
6

The Findings and Recommendations issued on January 27, 2017 (Doc. No. 19) are

3.

Plaintiff’s motion for an order to show cause why a permanent injunction should not be
issued, filed on October 26, 2016 (Doc. No. 13), is DENIED.

8
9
10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 6, 2017
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2