Thomas v. Davey et al

Filing 35

ORDER ADOPTING 34 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding Plaintiff's 21 30 Motions for Preliminary Injunction and Restraining Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 08/02/2017. (Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

EDWARD THOMAS,

12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,
v.
DAVE DAVEY, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17
18
19
20
21

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:16-cv-00925-AW-BAM (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION AND RESTRAINING ORDER
(ECF Nos. 21, 30)

Plaintiff Edward Thomas (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
pauperis, initiated this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on June 27, 2016.
On June 23, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations to deny

22

Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunction and restraining order.

23

Recommendations were served on Plaintiff, and contained notice that any objections were to be filed

24

within fourteen (14) days after service. (ECF No. 34 at pp. 3-4). More than fourteen days have passed

25

and no objections have been filed.

The Findings and

26

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

27

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and

28

recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

The Findings and Recommendations issued on June 23, 2017, are adopted in full;

3

2.

Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunction and restraining order, filed on March 1
and May 8, 2017 (Doc. Nos. 21, 30), are DENIED; and

4
5
6

3.

This matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings consistent
with this order.

7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9

Dated: August 2, 2017

10

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2